Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: finnman69

“Craig ADMITTED TO IT”

What did he admit to?


61 posted on 09/04/2007 6:03:09 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: sageb1
What did he admit to?

http://news.findlaw.com/nytimes/docs/crim/larry-craig-guilty-plea-agreement.html

According to the language of his guilty plea, Senator Craig voluntarily admitted to “engag[ing] in conduct which I knew or should have known tended to arouse alarm or resentment of others, which conduct was physical (versus veral) in nature.”

Significantly, Craig acknowledged that he was not claiming that he was “innocent of the charge to which I am entering a plea of guilty,” and that he "knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently g[a]ve up” certain constitutional rights by choosing to plead guilty.

A lawyer signed it. Craig is merely having second thoughts now it's out in the public. He's a disgrace. If he was innocent, he should have fought it then and not pleaded guilty.

102 posted on 09/04/2007 6:17:27 PM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson