Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawmakers Seek Bipartisanship on Iraq
AP via SFGate ^ | 9/4/7 | DAVID ESPO, AP Special Correspondent

Posted on 09/04/2007 2:53:22 PM PDT by SmithL

WASHINGTON, (AP) -- After a month at home with constituents, nearly a dozen members of the House issued a call Tuesday for bipartisan cooperation in Congress to stabilize Iraq and "bring our troops home" after more than four years of war.

The letter, signed by six Republicans and five Democrats, many of them political moderates, contained no specific timeline for withdrawing U.S. forces and took no position on earlier calls to limit future funds for the war.

Instead, it urged House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, to "work together to put an end to the political infighting" that has marked congressional debate on the conflict thus far.

The letter surfaced as Sen. Mitch McConnell, the Senate Minority Leader, R-Ky., told reporters most Republicans will wait to hear from Gen. David Petraeus, the commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, before taking a position on the war.

Petraeus is scheduled to issue a report and testify before Congress in the next week, events that have long loomed as a pivotal point in a war that has claimed the lives of more than 3,700 U.S. troops and cost more than $400 billion.

Fearful of political repercussions, Republican lawmakers recently have become increasingly impatient with the president's stewardship of the war. And McConnell — long a supporter of the president — appeared to acknowledge that some sort of a change in course is likely.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 110th; bipartisianship; boehner; iraq; pelosi

1 posted on 09/04/2007 2:53:25 PM PDT by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

no going to happen


2 posted on 09/04/2007 2:54:20 PM PDT by street_lawyer (Conservative Defender of the Faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Leftist dictionary —

Bipartisanship = do whatever the left wants


3 posted on 09/04/2007 2:58:38 PM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: street_lawyer
A win in Iraq would be like pouring salt on a slug to these “people”. I wouldn’t trust a ‘Rat to tell me the correct time let along pledge cooperation.
4 posted on 09/04/2007 2:59:51 PM PDT by rightwingextremist1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: street_lawyer

All the dems want to do is cut and run.


5 posted on 09/04/2007 3:00:03 PM PDT by jocko12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
contained no specific timeline for withdrawing U.S. forces and took no position on earlier calls to limit future funds for the war.

What's that noise I hear,why it must be the wailing and gnashing of teeth, coming from the moonbats;)

6 posted on 09/04/2007 3:00:16 PM PDT by mdittmar (May God watch over those who serve,and have served,to keep us free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
...many of them political moderates...

A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a virtue, but moderation in principle is always a vice.

Thomas Paine

There's nothing in the middle of the road but yellow stripes . . . and dead armadillos.

Jim Hightower

7 posted on 09/04/2007 3:01:54 PM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
One more...

To me, consensus seems to be the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies. So it is something in which no one believes and to which no one objects.

Margaret Thatcher

8 posted on 09/04/2007 3:03:34 PM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Ought’a fit those six Republicans for Rodney King t-shirts... then boot their sorry a$$es out of Washington.


9 posted on 09/04/2007 3:04:51 PM PDT by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Should be pretty easy to put together 10 House members from both parties who call for:

“. . . an victorious end to the war in Iraq that leaves the Iraqi people living in democracy.”

So get a handful of folks together to do that, all the while calling themselves moderates.


10 posted on 09/04/2007 3:06:37 PM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Bipartisanship is not appropriate for Iraq with a dozen parties involved, most of them not in Washington.


11 posted on 09/04/2007 3:06:53 PM PDT by RightWhale (It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Ayn Rand had a quote for stupid moderates too.


12 posted on 09/04/2007 3:07:16 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Bi-partisan in practice always seems to equate to anti-American.
13 posted on 09/04/2007 3:09:25 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Compromise is: getting rid of your principles a little bit at a time. - Patrick Lear

“Moderates” are good at this!


14 posted on 09/04/2007 3:41:23 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
ROFL - Democrats and backstabbing RINOs - that's "bipartisanship" - MSM style!

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

15 posted on 09/04/2007 3:41:44 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
“The spread of evil is the symptom of a vacuum.
Whenever evil wins, it is only by default: by the moral failure of those who evade the fact that there can be no compromise on basic principles.”
Source: Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal AYN RAND
16 posted on 09/04/2007 3:45:02 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
nearly a dozen members of the House...

WHOA! 12 people! There are what, 435 members of the House. A dozen means squat.

...and "bring our troops home" surrender after more than four years of war.

Yeah, that's right. Screw victory. We've made progress, let's just cut and run!
17 posted on 09/04/2007 4:41:25 PM PDT by G8 Diplomat (It's campaign season. Let's rumble!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson