Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HamiltonJay
>>>>>What now you are tattling on me to JimRob because you don’t like my oppinions? Wow, big man you are.

What a whiner! There is nothing wrong with conservative FReepers pointing out RudyBoosters to the bossman. After all, its his home and since about last March, Jim has said Free Republic doesn't support the liberal Giulinai for the GOP nomination. Period. In fact, FR has never supported liberalism of any kind. You may not like that, but frankly, I don't care what you like.

All your posts on this thread contain the same old worn out propaganda in support of Rooty Toot.

>>>>>Look, calling Rudy a liberal is insanity, I’ve offered pleanty of proof of my stand, and all you have offered is tired rhetoric, which I have answered before time and again.

Supporting a liberal on this conservative forum is the real insanity! Liberals are the enemy of conservatism. Around FR, supporting Giuliani is a form of political treason. Like it or not.

162 posted on 09/05/2007 11:08:57 AM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]


To: Reagan Man

Again, you fail to know what liberalism is. You brandy about a word without knowing its meaning, which just shows ignorance.

Your name calling aside, (the last hiding place of the lost argument) you haven’t offered anything but rhetoric.

Trying to frame Rudy as Hillary is comical in its ignorance.

Lets see who should conservatives vote for? Well lets look at the 2 that have any sort of poll numbers... Mitt... a supposedly converted pro-lifer who spent his life advocating abortion rights... but now that he’s running nationally he’s found Jesus.. or at least what the Morman faith claim is Jesus. He flubbs at softball questions about his own kids decisions about joining the service or not, and panders to whatever group he’s talking to..... Yea, he’s a voice and character for conservatism. He can’t even be honest about where he stands, because where he stands shifts with the wind... that’s not a leader I want, saw enough of that with Bubba.

Thompson... to date has offered NOTHING... and I do mean that. He’s espoused rhetoric to friendly crowds, nothing more... and the 1 question he had to answer about whether he advocated for abortion he lied about, turns out he did, (so where’s his moral backbone?) and then back tracked, side stepped and did a lousy 2 step.

So please tell me, which of these 2 guys are going to be the moral leader of the Republican party? Neither one can be honest with themselves or the people about their moral decisions, or even handle being questioned well. They can certainly pander if that’s all you want until election day, but sorry, not me.

I don’t want someone I agree with 100% of the time, because if I do, they obviously are lying their butts off. There is no way anyone who is being honest or has an ounce of honesty in their body can possibly hold the same views on every issue as hundreds of millions of americans, unless they are lying through their teeth.

I don’t see leadership out of Thompson or Mitt, both have flubbed the most softball of questions.

As I have said many times on this thread, a lot can happen between now and 11/08, but as of right now, I don’t see anyone else running that’s going to take out Rudy.

As to whining, no whining at all, it was more a questioning of your own manhood that you can’t handle your convictions on your own without running home to daddy. Not overly suprising behavior given everything else you’ve said here.


165 posted on 09/05/2007 11:32:54 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson