Books about it, web sights documenting the fraud will do nothing until the media are confronted in front of their audience.
The MSM will mount a counter attack, but the idea is to shake the thinkers loose and provide them a path to the truth.
The closest of anyone to doing that is Ann Coulter. But even she pulls back from the obvious (after a lot of soul searching, that is) conclusion that "objective journalism" can never be anything but a fraud from top to bottom, with no more substance than an offer to sell you the Brooklyn Bridge.
It's interesting steam of conscious thoughts spun with logic occasionally wind up being a bit more profound than originally intended.
Does appears to be a bit of a hurdle doesn't it.
How about this approach, instead of conservatives, let's look to another loosley affiliated group; the Republicans to fight the battle.
The MSM require Republicans in interview(confrontation) and debate to maintain their facade. Republicans can not simply boycott the MSM as the MSM would have free reign to define them... in a bad way.
On-air confrontations? Effective possibly but for a very short time. After a number of Republican on-air confrontations the MSM, the MSM would begin preparing spin lines to counter the charges.
Liberal leadership works that way; always a reason offered providing a neural path for the justification of not believing the obvious.
Therefore, I would have to concure, "objective journalism" can never be anything but a fraud from top to bottom
Regards