Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: decimon

I see nothing wrong with burning these books. Most contemporary books are unreadable and poorly written, mirroring the decline in the English language over the past half century. Of course, the article does not state how old these books are, but my guess is they were mostly “modern” books.


4 posted on 09/03/2007 2:33:23 PM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nwrep

In the New Testament in the Book of Acts, they burned books. These must have been occult books and full of slutty junk.


6 posted on 09/03/2007 2:40:31 PM PDT by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
IIRC, selling books without their covers is illegal.

Prospero's sounds like the Strand Bookstore in NYC. They buy and sell used books but probably have more of overstocks. What they can't sell must eventually get trashed so burning them instead is nothing but a symbolic statement. Right, wrong or otherwise, Tom Wayne wants to make a statement.

7 posted on 09/03/2007 2:47:04 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep

I see nothing wrong with burning these books. Most contemporary books are unreadable and poorly written, mirroring the decline in the English language over the past half century.


BURN ALL BOOKS UNDER 50 YEARS OLD!


9 posted on 09/03/2007 2:49:10 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson