Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPologist
Not to worry—she’s not even going to be nominated.

What's your reasoning on that?

49 posted on 09/03/2007 2:22:37 PM PDT by Mr. Silverback (Libs obviously don’t believe pro-lifers are terrorists, or they'd placate us by banning abortion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Silverback
Given that she just blew it by reemphasizing her support for pro-abortion, the Demo leaders now realize that she may not win the election if she is nominated.

Maybe the Repubs would hope that she is nominated—would be to their advantage because the majority of women are anti-abortion.

BTW, Barrack would be more appealing to women voters if he chooses to hold down the pro-abortion that Clinton espouses.

67 posted on 09/03/2007 3:26:08 PM PDT by GOPologist (By the time you decide to look for greener pastures, you're too old to climb the fence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson