Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

Still there is a risk of death. Tasers do not constitute the use of non-lethal force.


17 posted on 09/03/2007 5:22:08 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah; Horatio Gates
Drinking too much water poses a risk of death. So does a spray from a high pressure hose. That does not make a squirt gun a non-lethal weapon.

O.K. — the above was facetious (although true).

No weapon, including the Taser, should be over-used, or used carelessly.

Seriously now, consider the alternatives to the Taser:

1. Shoot the suspect with a gun — almost certainly lethal.

2. Pepper spray — sometimes (rarely) lethal — not as effective at stopping a determined violent criminal — could be fatal to the LEO, or to bystanders.

3. Fisticuffs, wrestling, or other bare-hand martial arts — places the LEO (and bystanders) in immediate danger — could be fatal to LEO or suspect — often not effective at subduing or capturing the suspect.

4. Billy club, bat, or similar weapon — could be fatal — high chance of brain injury — places LEO and bystanders in danger.

5. Ignore the situation — life and property of innocent people put at great risk. People want LEO to protect them & apprehend suspects with appropriate means. We also want to reduce risk to LEO. They (LEO) need a variety of tools to do their job safely and effectively. On balance, it seems to me that the Taser has a place in the LEO toolbox.

22 posted on 09/03/2007 9:55:44 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson