Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Geraldo Rivera unhinged [Geraldo would spit on Michelle Malkin if he saw her]
michellemalkin.com ^ | 9/1/2007 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 09/01/2007 10:17:03 AM PDT by PajamaTruthMafia

The Boston Globe has a fawning Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous-ish profile of Fox News Channel’s Geraldo Rivera. In between musing about his favorite pair of soft Uggs (”I’ve worn these in Tora Bora and Somalia,” he says, admiring the suede slip-ons with the sheepskin lining. “They’re so comfortable. I love them.”), his “36-foot Hinckley powerboat,” and his massive estates (including “Seagate, the spectacular, 10-bedroom estate he bought several years ago with his fourth wife” and another “Kennedy-esque compound” with his current wife), he spews this:

Rivera, who as a fledgling lawyer in the ’70s counseled the Puerto Rican nationalist group the Young Lords, says he can’t stomach the politicians and pundits who are stoking “anti-immigrant hysteria,” and his antipathy extends to some of his colleagues at Fox.

“Michelle Malkin is the most vile, hateful commentator I’ve ever met in my life,” he says. “She actually believes that neighbors should start snitching out neighbors, and we should be deporting people.

“It’s good she’s in D.C. and I’m in New York,” Rivera sneers. “I’d spit on her if I saw her.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: foxnews; geraldo; geraldorivera; gerryrivers; lowlife; malkin; michellemalkin; rivera; spit; whorealdo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-210 next last
To: edcoil

>>Lets all send them an email<<

I went to their website, and couldn’t find a link to send a complaint to.

Does anyone have a proper address?


181 posted on 09/01/2007 1:27:11 PM PDT by yorkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

“It’s good she’s in D.C. and I’m in New York,” Rivera sneers. “I’d spit on her if I saw her.”

Did rivera really say this?
what sort of person speaks this way
he would spit on her because of her opinions?
just incredible...
182 posted on 09/01/2007 1:33:21 PM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Andy'smom

bette midler hates him...has stories about him and poppers and forcing himself on women,,,if it is true, i don’t know


183 posted on 09/01/2007 1:45:45 PM PDT by Taffini (Mr. Pippin and Mr. Waffles do not approve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PajamaTruthMafia
Geraldo obviously tried hard to hit on Michelle and got shot down in flaming ruins. He never has gotten over the narcissistic wound to his hispanic bullshit macho-man identity. Poor sap. He's so transparent--about as much upstairs as inside Al Capone's safe.
184 posted on 09/01/2007 1:46:15 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RC2

how tall is gerald?


185 posted on 09/01/2007 1:48:29 PM PDT by Taffini (Mr. Pippin and Mr. Waffles do not approve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
Yes, I'm blind to the reality of the multitudinous legions of Geraldo supporters here... because I won't take the word of a guy with a three day posting history who claims to have been taking them on for years.

Firstly, I’ve been posting here at least 2 years longer than you under my former and still active username South40. But you had no way of knowing that so your ignorance is excused.

Secondly, I have no reason to fabricate my history of debating whoraldo supporters, nor would I. That said, your assertion that we've yet to see one in this thread is somehow proof they don’t exist is absurd. While they may be willing to defend him as a ‘good guy’ and used his alleged support of our troops as proof, perhaps they are reticent to the fact that he would make such a statement as spitting on a conservative Michelle Malkin. I would expect someone with your intelligence to have seen and understood that but I guess I’ve overestimated you. Then again, perhaps you do get it and you’re just still desperately clinging to your lost argument, humorous as it may be, considering my history of debates with whoraldo supporters predates your history of posting in this forum.

Have a nice day.

186 posted on 09/01/2007 1:48:29 PM PDT by ConservativeofColor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: PajamaTruthMafia
I liked this guy once.... I know regret it.

Michelle is a brilliant woman who is able to speak her mind and have an opinion that differs from others on FNC. To say that he would "spit on her" is just contemptible.

187 posted on 09/01/2007 1:58:17 PM PDT by Volunteer (Just so you know, I am ashamed the Dixie Chicks make records in Nashville.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PajamaTruthMafia
“It’s good she’s in D.C. and I’m in New York,” Rivera sneers. “I’d spit on her if I saw her.”

If I ran Fox News, I'd fire his ass for that remark.

188 posted on 09/01/2007 2:09:12 PM PDT by 3niner (War is one game where the home team always loses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 3niner
Michelle has always been respectful of others even of the cad Chris Matthews who attacked her with lies.

This is worse than what Imus said and FOX should fire Geraldo Rivera. Hope someone there is informed of it.

189 posted on 09/01/2007 2:14:39 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG; All; Anybody; Everybody
Does anyone have the video clip of Malkin on Hardball where Matthews talked down to Michelle and wrote her off as just a “girl” with no bona fides? And apparently literally sprayed her with his spittle? (No one should sit too close to that idiot.)

And the one where Zell Miller went on Hardball real soon afterwords and dressed down Matthews big time for being such an ass towards Malkin?

190 posted on 09/01/2007 2:20:26 PM PDT by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: PajamaTruthMafia

Jerry Rivers? Piss on him.


191 posted on 09/01/2007 2:20:51 PM PDT by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PajamaTruthMafia

I would refrain from spitting on Geraldo if I saw him, only because I’ve been taught better.


192 posted on 09/01/2007 2:22:47 PM PDT by pax_et_bonum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metesky
He’ll have to go a long way to beat Wilt Chamberlain.

And Wilt had undeniable talent, something Jerry Rivers is devoid of...............

193 posted on 09/01/2007 2:23:22 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: PajamaTruthMafia

To Jerry Rivers: If I ever saw you I would not spit on you.I would do something that rhymes with spit!!!


194 posted on 09/01/2007 4:24:04 PM PDT by ohiobushman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69
One night, actually around one in the morning in the 60s, a bunch of us 'utes were hanging out in front of a deli on Boylston St. in Boston when a cab pulled up and let out The Dipper and a nice little blond girl.

We all started, "Hey Dipper, lookin'good!" He laughed like heck and held his hand over the blonds head.

You can guess what height her head reached.

195 posted on 09/01/2007 5:08:55 PM PDT by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeofColor
Not proof that they don't exist. Proof that there aren't "lots" of Geraldo supporters here. That's what you said, and you were wrong. And it's an insult to the forum to suggest that there are.

If you'd said something to the effect of "It's hard to believe, six years ago Freepers actually bought this guy's BS", we wouldn't be having this conversation. But you said he had "lots" of supporters here, which is not even close to being truthful today. His support for the troops was exposed as a fraud a long time ago. Even the most gullible Freeper has been hip to his act for at least a couple years now. When the last time you took on these numerous supporters you're alleging? Can you show me a recent thread that supports your claim that he has lots of support here?

my history of debates with whoraldo supporters predates your history of posting in this forum.

Actually, I shared a username with my wife for about three years before creating this one. So if you're keeping score at home, my most recent username predates your most recent username, and my original username predates your original username.

Why do you need two accounts anyway? I thought that was against forum rules.

196 posted on 09/01/2007 5:23:46 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: CaptainK

“Gerald Rivera needs to have 60 illegals take up squatters rights on his estates and boats when they are unoccupied.”

You know I just smacked myself on the head when I saw this post. I don’t know why I didn’t think of it ‘till this moment but Geraldo’s probably got illegals taking care of his boat and property when he’s not in residence. Marion, Mass. is “spitting” distance from NEW BEDFORD. No wonder he was carrying on about the raids there, he could lose some of his help if it keeps up.


197 posted on 09/01/2007 5:45:37 PM PDT by Andy'smom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: PajamaTruthMafia

No-Class is as No-Class does.

Consider the source.


198 posted on 09/01/2007 5:50:56 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s........you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andy'smom

You put more thought into my post than I did, LOL.


199 posted on 09/01/2007 6:09:17 PM PDT by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
Not proof that they don't exist. Proof that there aren't "lots" of Geraldo supporters here. That's what you said, and you were wrong. And it's an insult to the forum to suggest that there are.

I said “lots” as in “many” because there are many. I know this to be true because I’ve engaged them for years. That you fail to grasp that simple fact is your problem, but it in no way proves your uninformed position. It just makes you look foolish. Moreover, you apparently have no concept of the meaning of the word, “lots” as you somehow misread and/or mischaracterized it and my use of it by inserting your own warped definition to read “multitudinous legions”, something I never said. I can see why you are confused but the doing is all yours.

If you'd said something to the effect of "It's hard to believe, six years ago Freepers actually bought this guy's BS", we wouldn't be having this conversation.

It didn’t happen just six years ago. It’s occurred many times in the past 6 years, which is the reason why I remember it so well. But trying to convince someone who fails to grasp the difference between “lots” and “multitudinous legions” is proving an impossible task. So be it.

But you said he had "lots" of supporters here, which is not even close to being truthful today.

It is very true. But again, you fail to grasp the simple meaning of the word. So be it.

His support for the troops was exposed as a fraud a long time ago. Even the most gullible Freeper has been hip to his act for at least a couple years now.

I don’t think they were gullible, I think they were stupid, just as the many Bill O'Reilly fans here are stupid. But you’re entitled to your own opinion.

When the last time you took on these numerous supporters you're alleging? Can you show me a recent thread that supports your claim that he has lots of support here?

I’ve logged 298 threads and 9,625 replies in the past 6 years. Proving to you what you what you clearly cannot grasp is not worth the time it would take me to sort through them. But you’re free, of course, to do so for yourself.

Actually, I shared a username with my wife for about three years before creating this one. So if you're keeping score at home, my most recent username predates your most recent username, and my original username predates your original username.

Sure you did. It wasn’t about proving who has been here the longest. It was about disproving your asinine statement that I had only a "3 day posting history”. BTW…I have been using this moniker for the past 33 days not 3, so you were wrong yet again. You do seem to make a habit of needlessly embarrassing yourself by making interjecting statements into subjects on which you clearly lack knowlwedge. Or do you really profess to know who I have debated in the last 6 years and on what?

Why do you need two accounts anyway? I thought that was against forum rules.

That is completely none of your business. And for the record, you thought wrong, again. The posting guidelines clearly state, “Don't represent yourself as another person, create or use another screen name to avoid a revocation of posting privileges (something I have not done as my other name has never been banned), misrepresent the site or your role in it,..."

Not only have I not done any of the above I have been open about who I am to you and to many others. And, before you embarrass yourself again, that "many" was not meant to connote "multitudinous legions".

Have a nice day.

200 posted on 09/01/2007 7:21:34 PM PDT by South40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-210 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson