Skip to comments.
Donor surrenders as Clinton camp ponders ... (The FBI has opened an investigation into donations)
LA Times ^
| September 1, 2007
| Dan Morain
Posted on 09/01/2007 7:39:27 AM PDT by IrishMike
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
To: EagleUSA
And America just stands there.....
As does the GOP leadership! If this were a Republican scandal the Dems would be holding a freaking press conference daily! It gets me so riled up!
41
posted on
09/01/2007 8:38:44 AM PDT
by
Nav_Mom
To: nutmeg
42
posted on
09/01/2007 8:41:07 AM PDT
by
nutmeg
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
To: IrishMike
LOOK... it's TouristSenator!!!
It shows up in more places than TouristGuy,
only with less style and substance...
she's Vaporware, just an empty crusty.
(Please spread me around like the parasite that i am...)
43
posted on
09/01/2007 8:42:05 AM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist)
To: IrishMike
“How did Democratic presidential front-runner Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s campaign fail to see the red flags in Hsu’s contributions?”
The red flags were probably all lost in the sea of red flags that already surround this group.
44
posted on
09/01/2007 8:42:48 AM PDT
by
monkeycard
(There is no such thing as too much ammo.)
To: IrishMike
The Clintonistas claimed that they “missed the vett” with Peter Paul and didn’t know about the Cuban Coffee Caper. That’s interesting. He had already been vetted by the Secret Service about six times for meetings with Nixon, Carter, Ford, Reagan and others.
45
posted on
09/01/2007 8:44:52 AM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: IrishMike
When a campaign has attracted more than 500,000 donors, as Clinton’s has, there is no way a candidate’s staff can check out each contributor.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You don’t check out guys giving twenty bucks. You do check out big donors.
46
posted on
09/01/2007 8:45:53 AM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: NormsRevenge
47
posted on
09/01/2007 8:49:03 AM PDT
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!)
To: big bad easter bunny; Alamo-Girl
Paging Alamo Girl.
Your Downside Legacy is having a re-birth.
48
posted on
09/01/2007 8:50:32 AM PDT
by
Diver Dave
(Because He Lives, I Can Face Tomorrow)
To: All
Question for any/all...
Like with the Larry Craig PAC monies being unloaded as fast as it can, I see reports that the Hildebeast is ‘giving the (Hsu) contributions to charity’ as though that makes it all better (and makes it just go away).
Do they then get to write off this ‘charitable contribution’?
Shouldn’t they be forced to hand the dirty money back to the contributer (with appropriate paparazzi memorializing the event?!)
49
posted on
09/01/2007 8:52:08 AM PDT
by
rockrr
(Global warming is to science what Islam is to religion)
To: Diver Dave
Thanks for letting me know!
To: rockrr
They donate to a “charity” like NOW who finds ways to slip the money right back to them... at least that is my thought.
51
posted on
09/01/2007 8:58:05 AM PDT
by
Ingtar
(The LDS problem that Romney is facing is not his religion, but his Lacking Decisive Stands.)
To: IrishMike
How in the world did California allow this guy Hsu to elude justice for 15 frickin’ years? To me, that is a big part of the story.
52
posted on
09/01/2007 8:59:33 AM PDT
by
khnyny
(The best minds are not in government. If they were, business would hire them away. Ronald Reagan)
To: pookie18
53
posted on
09/01/2007 9:00:29 AM PDT
by
IrishMike
(As America wins, the Democrats and their apologists lose.)
To: IrishMike
When a campaign has attracted more than 500,000 donors, as Clinton's has, there is no way a candidate's staff can check out each contributor.No, but how many of those donors give over $100,000? She should easily be able to check out the top 20. Obviously, she turned a blind eye. Try again, LASlimes.
54
posted on
09/01/2007 9:00:44 AM PDT
by
expatpat
To: IrishMike
Goes to show that a Clinton presidency could not be trusted...could be easily infiltrated and influenced by the Communist Chinese.
To: doug from upland
Remember Gore and the buddist monks ?
56
posted on
09/01/2007 9:06:00 AM PDT
by
IrishMike
(As America wins, the Democrats and their apologists lose.)
To: doug from upland
In talking to reporters now, I believe the Hsu case is changing everything. Doug, please expound on what you mean, here. Are you hearing that this story has legs?
57
posted on
09/01/2007 9:10:32 AM PDT
by
MamaLucci
(God Bless Our Troops)
To: citizencon
Goes to show that a Clinton presidency could not be trusted...could be easily infiltrated and influenced by the Communist Chinese.
.........................................................
The Clintons had many relationships with various enemies of the Country and scumbags in general such as drug dealers etc. The common denominator ???? The Dollar.
58
posted on
09/01/2007 9:12:40 AM PDT
by
IrishMike
(As America wins, the Democrats and their apologists lose.)
To: rockrr
...I see reports that the Hildebeast is giving the (Hsu) contributions to charity as though that makes it all better (and makes it just go away). Do they then get to write off this charitable contribution? Who is going to verify that any of it moves out of Hillary's campaign fund?
If she does give it to "charity", will it be the Clinton Global Initiative or the Clinton Foundation, or maybe one of her former piggy banks, The Childrens Defense Fund?
59
posted on
09/01/2007 9:35:10 AM PDT
by
Sal
(My "good" Senator Kyl exposed himself as a Grand Betrayer, corrupt to the core!)
To: Lurker
They didn't fail to see them. They were complicit. Remember when she listed her contributions from the American Muslim Council as the American Museum Council and then claimed it was an accidental misspelling?
I gotta wonder when the pile of their scams gets so high and heavy that it becomes too much even for the sheep.
60
posted on
09/01/2007 9:41:24 AM PDT
by
Sal
(My "good" Senator Kyl exposed himself as a Grand Betrayer, corrupt to the core!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson