Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court: Mexican trucks program to proceed (9th Circus says 'Let 'em roll!')
AP on Yahoo ^ | 8/31/07 | Jordan Robertson - ap

Posted on 08/31/2007 6:32:37 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 601-602 next last
To: stephenjohnbanker

LOL,,,that one came from one of the “Pizen-Chineezz-Fud”
threads,,,
For the “Things I Didn’t Want To Know” file,,,yuck !...:0/


301 posted on 09/01/2007 5:28:26 PM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

LOL :)


302 posted on 09/01/2007 5:36:53 PM PDT by jedward (I'm not sure you meant, what I understand...or maybe you did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: jedward

Ever seen a definition of ‘secretariat’?


303 posted on 09/01/2007 6:54:36 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer (I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Nope, but I bet you have one! I did find an interesting Meeting Summary from the latest NAFTA mtg held a couple weeks ago...

http://www.sice.oas.org/TPD/NAFTA/Commission/2007Meeting_e.pdf


304 posted on 09/01/2007 7:20:31 PM PDT by jedward (I'm not sure you meant, what I understand...or maybe you did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

Here’s another good item on where the buck stops.

~excerpt~

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, acting under the authority vested in me
by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including section 604 of the 1974 Act and section 202 of the NAFTA

Implementation Act, do hereby proclaim:
(1) In order to reflect in the HTS modifications to the rules of origin under the NAFTA, general note 12 to the HTS is modified as provided in the Annex to this proclamation.

(2) The modifications made by this proclamation shall be effective with respect to goods of Canada or of Mexico, under the terms of general note 12 to the HTS, that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after July 1, 2006.

(3) Any provisions of previous proclamations and Executive Orders that are inconsistent with the actions taken in this
proclamation are superseded to the extent of such inconsistency.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eleventh day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand six, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first.

GEORGE W. BUSH

###

http://www.sice.oas.org/TPD/NAFTA/ROO/USROO2006.pdf


305 posted on 09/01/2007 7:24:59 PM PDT by jedward (I'm not sure you meant, what I understand...or maybe you did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: ran20
If any group isn’t willing to violently enforce their property rights

Yup. That's the point. History didn't end, and human nature doesn't change.

Mexicans - Latin Americans - see themselves as a group, a nation. Thus they operate in concert.

The Americans have been de-nationalized by a long succession of judicial usurpations - so called "civil rights" laws that went well beyond what was in the enabling amendments - and guilt tripping incited by cultural Marxists who see it as a way of undermining and weakening a powerful nation, not as an egalitarian good - that's just their cover story.

The same has not happened to other nations. They are more visceral, feral groups who see opportunism as legitimate. If an American were to try and protect his property the way he is entitled to, he would be at minimum sued, at maximum arrested and jailed. Look at what happened to Roger Barnett in Arizona - an obvious set-up.

We either get rid of the self imposed limits that make us weak or we go down, hard.

306 posted on 09/01/2007 7:28:25 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

It just occured to me that the url I linked for the meeting is coming off the Oganization of American States (OAS) domain. Oh, the irony (pffssst)


307 posted on 09/01/2007 7:31:49 PM PDT by jedward (I'm not sure you meant, what I understand...or maybe you did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

Hmmmm...it seems all the NAFTA documents are. That’s almost too funny.


308 posted on 09/01/2007 7:35:48 PM PDT by jedward (I'm not sure you meant, what I understand...or maybe you did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: jedward

LOL,,,I remember that thread...;0)


309 posted on 09/01/2007 7:37:29 PM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

Do you remember the ending? (lmao x 10)


310 posted on 09/01/2007 7:46:27 PM PDT by jedward (I'm not sure you meant, what I understand...or maybe you did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

What was their original name again? Back when they were founded...I forget?


311 posted on 09/01/2007 7:50:02 PM PDT by jedward (I'm not sure you meant, what I understand...or maybe you did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

Do we want to relive some of that for education purposes (lol) It’s all there....’right in there face’ (shaking head)


312 posted on 09/01/2007 7:54:46 PM PDT by jedward (I'm not sure you meant, what I understand...or maybe you did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: jedward

LOL,,,I don’t remember either,,,It seemed to fit...;0)


313 posted on 09/01/2007 7:59:34 PM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68
In 1890, the First International Conference of American States, held in Washington, D.C., established the International Union of American Republics and its secretariat, the Commercial Bureau of the American Republics—the forerunner of the OAS.
 
314 posted on 09/01/2007 8:11:02 PM PDT by jedward (I'm not sure you meant, what I understand...or maybe you did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

Yep...I’d say it fits pretty snug :)


315 posted on 09/01/2007 8:11:42 PM PDT by jedward (I'm not sure you meant, what I understand...or maybe you did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

In that meeting, they were laying groudwork for another meeting I belief was held recently. Even though they noted in the minutes that they had laid ground work for the meetings, I’m sure there’s actually no real relation between their desires (lolol)


316 posted on 09/01/2007 8:13:37 PM PDT by jedward (I'm not sure you meant, what I understand...or maybe you did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta
“Somehow I don’t think this will be overturned.”

From searching today it seams you may be right. Maybe all those who brought the original suit have been talked to by their handlers.

My suspicion is this goes up that chain pretty far. Could this just be a round about way to start to “integrate” acceptance of illegal immigrant related interests into the us economy?

Having this over turned would put a further stake in the illegal immigrant/amnesty shoot down of all the higher ups who tried to jam it past congress a few months ago.

317 posted on 09/01/2007 8:16:05 PM PDT by JSteff (Reality= understanding you are not nearly important enough for the government to tap your phone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: jedward

And Plottin Again’ The Taxpayer All The Way...


318 posted on 09/01/2007 8:29:14 PM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: 1COUNTER-MORTER-68

*** Here’s the most recent release (I suspect the one that’s been held up) from DOT. The inspection portion to the program, which I’ll link in a min is the possible ‘snag’ if someone creates...ooops, I mean finds one (lol). Bad welds come to mind. That’s at least a year’s hold up to make sure everyone is complient from Suppliers through to Manufacturers.

Cross Border Truck Safety Inspection Program
News
DOT 21-07
Friday, February 23, 2007
Contact: Sarah Echols
Tel.: (202) 366-4570

New Program to Allow U.S. Trucks into Mexico for the First Time Ever,
Change Way Some Mexican Trucks Operate Within the United States

El Paso, Texas – U.S. trucks will for the first time be allowed to make deliveries in Mexico under a year-long pilot program that expands cross border trucking operations with Mexico, U.S. Transportation Secretary Mary E. Peters announced today during a visit to truck inspection facilities in El Paso, Texas.

U.S. trucks will get to make deliveries into Mexico while a select group of Mexican trucking companies will be allowed to make deliveries beyond the 20-25 mile commercial zones currently in place along the Southwest border.

Secretary Peters said the new demonstration program was designed to simplify a process that currently requires Mexican truckers to stop and wait for U.S. trucks to arrive and transfer cargo. She said this process wastes money, drives up the cost of goods, and leaves trucks loaded with cargo idling inside U.S. borders. The Secretary added that under current rules, U.S. trucks are not allowed into Mexico because the United States refused to implement provisions of the North American Free Trade Agreement that would have permitted safe cross-border trucking.

“The United States has never shied away from opportunities to compete, to open new markets and to trade with the world. Now that safety and security programs are in place, the time has come for us to move forward on this longstanding promise with Mexico,” Secretary Peters said.

“We are committed to retaining a high level of security and safety standards under this program,” said Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff. “The tough security measures we already have in place will remain unchanged, resulting in a smart and secure approach to safeguarding the border, while allowing for American and Mexican carriers to deliver cargo outside of arbitrary commercial zones.”

“Today’s announcement is another sign of the strength of the U.S.-Mexico relationship and a further step towards making our economies globally competitive, promoting mutual economic growth and prosperity while continuing to protect the safety of our borders,” said Commerce Secretary Carlos M. Gutierrez.

“Safety is the number one priority and strict U.S. safety standards won’t change,” Secretary Gutierrez continued. “We will continue to work closely with President Calderon and his administration on ways we can further enhance the commerce of our countries and the competitiveness of our hemisphere without sacrificing safety or security.”

Secretary Peters noted that the Department of Transportation has put in place a rigorous inspection program to ensure the safe operation of Mexican trucks crossing the border. Yesterday, Peters and Mexican Secretary of Communications and Transportation Luis Téllez announced a program to have U.S. inspectors conduct in-person safety audits to make sure that participating Mexican companies comply with U.S. safety regulations. The regulations require all Mexican truck drivers to hold a valid commercial drivers license, carry proof they are medically fit, comply with all U.S. hours-of-service rules and be able to understand questions and directions in English.

Secretary Peters said those Mexican truck companies that may be allowed to participate in the one-year program will all be required to have insurance with a U.S. licensed firm and meet all U.S. safety standards. Companies that meet these standards will be allowed to make international pick up and deliveries only and will not be able to move goods from one U.S. city for delivery to another, haul hazardous materials or transport passengers.

The first Mexican trucks to be authorized under the program will begin traveling beyond U.S. border areas once the initial in-person safety inspections are done and proof-of-insurance verified. Secretary Peters noted that with the announcement of the program, Mexico will begin to consider applications from U.S. trucking firms for licensing rights to operate within Mexico. Approximately 100 U.S. operators would be licensed by Mexico for cross-border operations.

In 2001, Congress authorized the cross border inspection program and listed 22 safety requirements that had to be in place before other steps were implemented. The Secretary noted that the Department’s independent Inspector General’s reports have confirmed success in meeting the congressional requirements. In addition, Secretary Peters said the Department has invested $500 million since 1995 to modernize border safety facilities and hire and train the over 500 federal and state inspectors who inspect trucks crossing the border every day.

“We have years of experience, we have a rigorous safety inspection plan in place and we have the facilities and the trained professionals to carry it out,” Secretary Peters said. “Through this new pilot program, we are finding a better way to do business with one of this nation’s largest trading partners, and in doing so, bringing U.S. drivers more opportunity, U.S. consumers more buying power and the U.S. economy even more momentum,” she added.

# # #

http://www.dot.gov/affairs/cbtsip/dot2107.htm


319 posted on 09/01/2007 8:41:42 PM PDT by jedward (I'm not sure you meant, what I understand...or maybe you did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: jedward

Cross Border Truck Safety Inspection Program
Last updated February 23, 2007

http://www.dot.gov/affairs/cbtsip/index.htm

*** On this topic, it doesn’t seem like they want to share anything with us interested citizens.


320 posted on 09/01/2007 8:47:45 PM PDT by jedward (I'm not sure you meant, what I understand...or maybe you did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 601-602 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson