[Jeff Head]

Irrespective, the truth still stands, the supreme court is not the final authority on what is right and wrong.

We have activst and in some cases, immoral judges ruling on matters of morality. Morality is the underpinning of our free society.

Sooner or later, the trend will reverse itself...or we will lose more and more of our our freedoms and liberty and the very heritage that made them possible in the first place.

But even that will not change the difference between right and wrong...just our position in relation to it.

[nathanbedford]

I don't disagree with anything you said there nor does anything you said there disagree with anything I wrote. Certainly the Supreme Court is not the final arbiter of morality that is a question between us and our God. But the Supreme Court is surely the final arbiter of law and to maintain otherwise is simply ludicrous.

My argument is not that homosexuality is moral or immoral but there are now limits to the ability of conservatives to impose their morality through the law-and that is not entirely a bad thing when you see how these bathroom prosecutions undermine our rule of law.

You will also note that I'm very firm that we conservatives should expect the law to oppose homosexuality in support of higher values.

[gidget7]

For what it’s worth Jeff, I (and betting most other conservatives) agree with you! It is unnatural, and extremely unhealthy. End of discussion, or it should be.

We hear libs sounding bogus alarms for the pulic health and well being day in and day out, and NOTHING about the dangers of this disease and injury ridden lifestyle. I will not lie to them. That is called being an enabler, and it isn’t helpful or loving.