Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Waryone
I did the following: Engaged in conduct which I knew or should have known tended to arouse alarm or resentment of others which was physical (versus verbal) in nature.

Tended to arouse... resentment.

Does that include picking your nose? Popping zits onto the mirror? Washing your underwear in the sink?

Or does it mean tapping one's shoe or touching the bottom of the wall which divides two stalls?

I think we all better be much more careful in the men's room from now on one never knows if some super sensitive lurker might get a resentment-oh I forgot I'm protected because I'm only guilty if I should have known that a lurker would get a resentment.

Is this the kind of criminal law that you as a conservative want to have enforced?


134 posted on 08/31/2007 8:40:08 PM PDT by nathanbedford ("I like to legislate. I feel I've done a lot of good." Sen. Robert Byrd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford

I know I don’t have to worry about it. I’ve used public restrooms as most people have and have never had to worry about my actions being considered disorderly.

Not everyone can say that. Those who can’t seem to figure that the only right they have is to their own stall need to be very afraid.

It’s time for people to go about using the bathroom without worrying about peeping toms, roaming feet, or rush-in hands.


139 posted on 08/31/2007 8:53:07 PM PDT by Waryone (Constantly amazed by society's downhill slide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson