Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmithL

I find the actions of Bill Clinton’s wife extremely hilarious in this whole fiasco. Rather than give the money back to the crook, she’s going to “donate” it to some “charity” that accepts stolen money. By doing that, she can turn this thing into a “win-win” situation for Clinton, Inc. She’ll get all the warm fuzzies associated with donating to “charity” from her adoring masses yearning to make history by electing “the first woman president” AND she’ll have another large tax deduction to report to the IRS. LOL! Those damn ‘RATS are always always thinking ahead.


13 posted on 08/31/2007 8:25:56 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (When you start seeing FR as a "hate site," it's time for you to go to rehab.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: FlingWingFlyer

Yes, the “I gave it to a charity” is the excuse she used earlier this year with the previous illegal contributions.

Which charity? It’s a pretty un-verifable claim.


16 posted on 08/31/2007 9:00:07 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: FlingWingFlyer
Rather than give the money back to the crook, she’s going to “donate” it to some “charity” that accepts stolen money.

Now that is a great soundbite. And a great point.

The recipient...if there is one...should be asked: "So, your organization accepts stolen money? Is this a standing policy or have you made an exception for Senator Clinton (Elliot Spitzer, Barack Obama, Doris Matsui, John Kerry, fill in the blank with any one of sixty names.)

36 posted on 08/31/2007 11:23:04 AM PDT by Eroteme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson