In light of your depleted credibility on that issue, i don't see why anybody on this board should accept anything that you have to say on the subject of Ron Paul's run for the Republican Nomination.
That said, now we examine the newest piece of drivel to come from your keyboard.
The point of disagreement is the question of whether or not the US is responsible for 9/11.
In light of Ron Paul's vote For the authorisation of force against the Taliban and al Qaeda in Afghanistan, it is apparent that he knows who is responsible for 9/11.
Your paltry attempt to parse the argument so as to make Paul's argument into a case of explaining motivation=justification isn't fooling anyone except the most hardcore Paulitrolls on this board, and those who presume to understand the Middle East, yet can't even explain the differences between Suni and Shiite.
So, do you also question the patriotism of the head of the CIA bin Laudin desk and the 9/11 commission, both of which Paul cited in his response ~among them, a Vietnam war Medal of Honor winner~?
The rest of your argument falls with the false premise that you have presented.
Is an asskicking an asskicking if it only takes place in CDL's dreams?
Fact: David Duke's website has trumpteted the supposed virtues of Ron Paul.
Fact: Ron Paul's campaign has yet to repudiate Duke's words of support.
In light of Ron Paul's vote For the authorisation of force against the Taliban and al Qaeda in Afghanistan
That vote was back in the days before Ron Paul started running with the Alex Jones crowd. It certainly wouldn't be the first time Ron Paul was caught in an obvious contradiction - in fact the vote you reference is doubly an example of contradiction, since Ron Paul has since repudiated authorizations of force as "unconstitutional."
So, do you also question the patriotism of the head of the CIA bin Laudin desk
I don't need to question it - I already know he is a traitor.
and the 9/11 commission, both of which Paul cited in his response ~among them, a Vietnam war Medal of Honor winner~?
Just because Ron Paul quotes someone out of context in order to further his anti-American agenda doesn't mean the quoted source agrees with that agenda.
And someone's status as a non-posthumous MOH winner doesn't guarantee their patriotism. Benedict Arnold would certainly have received one after Ticonderoga or Saratoga had they existed at the time.
Who TF do you think you are? Who died and left you king?
In light of Ron Paul's vote For the authorisation of force against the Taliban and al Qaeda in Afghanistan, it is apparent that he knows who is responsible for 9/11.
He said the US is responsible for it. I heard him say it at one of the debates.
I used to (emphasis on "used to") like and respect Paul prior to his devolving into moonbattery regarding the Iraq War.
No more.