lmao at this ridiculous lie. Evolution has NEVER identified this first life form, nor does it care to, because it cannot. Furthermore, the prevailing opinion amongst the evo posters here is that abiogenesis has nothing to do with evolution. Evolution is based on a single common ancestor that will NOT be identified. It doesn't matter what the first life form was, just that it's successive generations continually added information as it evolved into the millions of distinct life forms we see today. Evolution science continues to pretend that the coming into existence of the first life form is irrelevant to the theory.
Evolution does NOT EXPLAIN THE ORIGIN OF LIFE DOWN TO THE BEGINING. It only portends to explain all the life forms coming into existence AFTER the first (NEVER HAS/NOR TO BE IDENTIFIED) life form. Mathematics has nothing to do with evolution either. Hence the reason for this entire argument in the first place.
Evolution and ID are competing theories for how living creatures change over time.
Evolution believes it is random chance that determines the next step.
ID believes it is a deliberate mechanism that chooses the next step.
Time and more study will reveal which is the superior theory.
Why do evolutionists act like ID is a threat if it is just creationism in disguise?