[pandoraou812]

Well from what I’ve heard some places in cities actually have holes in the sides of the walls for the men to stick it through. IMO thats disgusting not to mention it can spread STD’s, AIDS & whatever else they have. If there were complaints on harassment from pervs toward normal men & the cop was there checking things out IMO he was doing his job. IMO if you can’t use a restroom without a perv coming on to you then the cop belonged there to protect the normal men. I don’t care if you want to call it entrapment. Normal people shouldn’t have to be exposed to some creep sticking his foot into your stall or peeking into it either.

[AmericanInTokyo]

Lets “think out of the stall” creatively, and see ways to design public restrooms in the USA to discourage this kinda nonsense then!

[dr_lew]

I don’t care if you want to call it entrapment.

You should say, "I don't care if it IS entrapment." because, you know, it is.

BTW, I agree entirely with your POV that this is a completely legitimate police function, and that we as a society should not tolerate this sort of activity in public restrooms, and so on.

But still, I think that the police report shows that the officer was at pains to minimize the degree to which he made indications to Craig ( and to others he encountered in this line of duty ) that he would be receptive to such advances as Craig was then encouraged to make. If they didn't do this, they wouldn't catch anybody!

The Law lies to itself, just as everybody else does.

[mamelukesabre]

“...cop belonged there to protect the normal men.”
~~~~~~~

I don’t understand why “normal” men need protecting. Can’t they protect themselves? It’s just a few homos for crying out loud.