Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rb ver. 2.0

“Have any of these early, absurd game show looking debates served any purpose, other than for the candidates to primp and strut?”

They provided a forum for Obama to make several controversial statements on foreign policy, and his support seems to have deteriorated up to 10 points. Hillary now seems in command unless something happens to change the momentum.

And they serve to allow the eight or more candidates a few debates until the also rans thin out. I doubt we will or should deny them entry in early debates, but hopefully the process will be down to three or so viable candidates by November or December.

Even though they’re pretty boring, with the way the primaries are now scheduled, it’s probably good to start early and thin out the candidates some before the post-New Hampshire primaries are held.


53 posted on 08/30/2007 2:55:51 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Will88

OK, so what everyone remembers about these early debates is “how bad” one or more candidates did.

Thompson avoiding these pre-season debates was a brilliant campaign strategy.


55 posted on 08/30/2007 2:59:15 PM PDT by Rb ver. 2.0 (Reunite Gondwanaland!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson