I can defend me and mine. I will put down many with my 12 gauge and glock 40s. It is all you wimpy Paulnuts, liberals and can’t we just convert to Islam and not cause a problem surrendercrats that would give up the fight and thus too much ground on our soil for those of willing to stand and fight them. Instead of killing and defeating them off on foreign soil, Paul would rather fight them here.
Paul is a nut job, and a dangerous one to boot. Its 2007 not 1789 or 1935...
maybe a shot is the ass with my Daisy BB gun will change your mind.... :)
Rest assured...I would defend you and yours as well...and I know you would do the same for me...we're all Americans. But I'm not too concerned that Muslim hordes will invade the US and ever be able to force my daughters or your daughters to wear burkas or pray to Allah. I live in rural NJ where most of the people I know hunt...and an invading Muslim horde wouldn't make it through my county into PA.
My only concern is that Al Qaeda will be able to cite America's military presence in the middle east to incite more of these barbarians to sneak across our border and blow up Americans...but I don't see how Iraq has done anything but made Al Qaeda's job easier in that respect.
I really don't believe that Paul's criticism of American policies in the middle east is based on wimpiness...more a fundamental belief (which I share) that government only ever screws things up...and that policies that may be designed to protect American interests only ever make things worse...less government intervention...home and abroad is better
I remember in the 1990's when BJ Clinton was helping the Muslim hordes in the Balkans...many Republicans (including Ron Paul) were critical of BJ and American involvement there and, in particular, saw how American help to the Muslims in Bosnia and Kosovo (and their allies including bin Laden) and the Clinton Administration's decision to let Iran ship arms to those Muslims would only help the radical Islamists set up a base there and strengthen the radical Muslim worldwide...the Republicans then have been proven right...I think those who supported the invasion of Iraq were wrong this time
That being said...the invasion is water under the bridge now...and I think Paul is wrong to advocate immediate withdrawal from Iraq...but I don't think for a minute that Paul is advocating that because he's a wimp...or because he "wants to see America lose"...that's stupid