To: George W. Bush
I don’t consider myself a supporter of Ron Paul (or any of the other Republican candidates) at this point. But I have to admire his honesty and the way he is running his campaign. He’s the kind of candidate we need more of, instead of the horde of Larry-Craigs-Who-Haven’t-Been-Caught-Yet we are usually forced to choose from.
7 posted on
08/30/2007 6:03:54 AM PDT by
Mr. Jeeves
("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
To: Mr. Jeeves
Hes the kind of candidate we need more of, instead of the horde of Larry-Craigs-Who-Havent-Been-Caught-Yet we are usually forced to choose from.
True enough. After Vitter's whoremongering and Craig's toilet-inappropriate fiasco, you start to wonder about, say, Lott's unsavory habits involving toupees. Or what Arlen Specter might do in a kilt. With Ron Paul, you get a gentle mature baby doctor, a doctor as conservative as Tom Coburn. Or the new doctor/congressman from Georgia's 10th district, Broun, who ran as a Ron Paul-style conservative and constitutionalist, upsetting the GOP establishment favorite with all the money and party support.
10 posted on
08/30/2007 6:10:26 AM PDT by
George W. Bush
(Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
To: Mr. Jeeves
I haven’t seen him distinguish himself in that regard yet.
To: Mr. Jeeves
Hes the kind of candidate we need more of Got his own opinions for sure. Some of them are interesting, but some of them are out of left field. Perhaps some of his ideas will form the basis of discussion, but he won't get any closer to the Presidency than he is now.
68 posted on
08/30/2007 8:15:52 AM PDT by
RightWhale
(It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson