Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: YoungKentuckyConservative
Ryan said she then asked to see the manager and handed him a copy of the 2006 Kentucky law that prohibits interference with a woman breast-feeding her baby in public.

It would seem to me that the woman was trolling for a law suite. The kid is seven months old, ween it lady.

2 posted on 08/29/2007 6:22:57 PM PDT by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: org.whodat

Every breastfeeding mother should carry slips of paper with the area laws printed on it, just in case. And seven months old is still a baby.


5 posted on 08/29/2007 6:30:52 PM PDT by LongElegantLegs ("What quails?" asked Jack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: org.whodat

Ryan said she then asked to see the manager and handed him a copy of the 2006 Kentucky law that prohibits interference with a woman breast-feeding her baby in public.
It would seem to me that the woman was trolling for a law suit.”
_______________
That’s how it appeared to me as well. Hopefully a jury will see it the same way. What is it with these women? They act like mega-attention-seekers.


13 posted on 08/29/2007 6:34:29 PM PDT by cowdog77 (" Are there any brave men left in Washington, or are they all cowards?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: org.whodat
Maybe, or perhaps she'd just run into people trying to stop her from doing what the law says she's allowed to do.

Now that's not meant as an endorsement on my part of the law itself, because I don't think the state of Kentucky should be telling Applebees what they can or can't allow in their stores, like smoking say.

38 posted on 08/29/2007 6:49:48 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: org.whodat
trolling for a law suite

Not at all. That infor is routinely handed out at hospitals and doctors' offices because women are harrassed.

The kid is seven months old, ween it lady.

First of all, the child is not an it, but a human being. Second, seven months old is typically too early to wean a baby.

61 posted on 08/29/2007 7:10:51 PM PDT by mockingbyrd (peace begins in the womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: org.whodat
Your comment is just ignorant. Babies who are being nursed should be EXCLUSIVELY breastfed until 6 months of age.

After that, solids are introduced - but breastmilk is still the primary food for babies that young.

Breastmilk is the natural first food for babies, it provides all the energy and nutrients that the infant needs for the first months of life, and it continues to provide up to half or more of a child’s nutritional needs during the second half of the first year, and up to one-third during the second year of life.

And the World Health Organization and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend breastfeeding until the baby is AT LEAST 12 months old, and then afterward, for as long as mutually desired by mother and child.

And I don't feel that simply having a copy of the law at the ready is at all negative or "trolling for a lawsuit." People obviously are unaware of the law a lot of the time, and there have been quite a few of highly-publicized instances lately where nursing mothers have been harrassed. It's actually a good idea to be prepared.
66 posted on 08/29/2007 7:14:18 PM PDT by mommamcgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: org.whodat
It would seem to me that the woman was trolling for a law suite. The kid is seven months old, ween it lady.

Those ignorant of a subject should not hold strong opinions about it. Babies should be breastfed for at least a year, and you aren't supposed to feed them anything but breast milk for the first six months.

154 posted on 08/29/2007 8:48:39 PM PDT by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: org.whodat

You’re kidding, right? 7 or 8 months old and she should WEAN HIM? Every woman should breastfeed until at LEAST one year, and many do for much longer than that — till two years old.

Remember, friend. In Bible times, it was until age 5. Interesting some people still have issues with this. Isn’t
this 2007???


338 posted on 08/30/2007 4:37:56 PM PDT by adopt4Christ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: org.whodat

The fact that she had the law on her isn’t a big deal. Health departments and doctors have these things in their offices/pass them out. Additionally articles on breastfeeding recommend carrying a copy of your state’s laws in case you do run into issues. And now that this has happened I will carry one with me now as well when I have children. Do some research on breastfeeding before you make a seemingly smart remark. 7 months is too early to wean a child. Further, more women should breastfeed. It is theorized that if that were the case we wouldn’t have to pump babies full of immunizations. Because of jerks that complain about it and give people hard times over it, women don’t do it. It’s ridiculous. And we’re the only society that has this big of an issue with it. Worldwide, average weaning age is between 2.8 and 4 years old. Breastmilk adapts to suit the needs of the child as it grows. Get a clue.


433 posted on 09/01/2007 8:50:01 PM PDT by SLD_08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: org.whodat; YoungKentuckyConservative; RGSpincich; jimboster; LongElegantLegs; Mr Rogers

I’ll bet that La Leche League is encouraging nursing moms to carry copies of the law.

Thirty and 25 years ago, when I was a member, we were pretty militant. I got so irritated with the resistance to natural birth and breastfeeding that I went on to med school. Carrying the doggone law is not that big a deal in comparison, is it?

7 months is way too early to wean human babies. Quite a few of women and babies can’t manage the pump and bottle for several reasons.

RGSpincich, The human doesn’t have an “udder.” What a dumb statement.


491 posted on 09/05/2007 9:13:46 PM PDT by hocndoc (http://www.lifeethics.org/www.lifeethics.org/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: org.whodat

As incidents involving the harrassment of nursing mothers are frequently reported in the US - so much so that the relevant statutes are routinely provided by doctors to their lactating patients - this woman will be far from unusual in keeping them to hand. It makes sense to ensure that you can easily inform objecting establishments of your legal rights, especially as incidents such as this one prove that many staff are still unaware of women’s rights in this capacity.

The World Health Organisation, which advises governments on health and welfare issues, recommends exclusive breastfeeding until around 6 months and breast milk as the main/major source of nutrition until at LEAST 12 months. Additionally, it advises that breastfeeding has significant health and other benefits until the child is at least 2 years of age.

So...no. She shouldn’t be weaning the baby yet. He will still require breastmilk for some time to come, and she’s doing the best possible thing for his future health by following the doctors’ advice, rather than yours - which seems to be heavily underinformed.


519 posted on 03/04/2008 6:17:44 AM PST by Kamagrian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: org.whodat
It would seem to me that the woman was trolling for a law suite.

I always carry a copy of the constitution, so that whe someone says they have a "right" to an abortion, healthcare, etc, I can ask them to 'show me where!'

528 posted on 03/04/2008 2:01:54 PM PST by FatherofFive (Islam is an EVIL like no other, and must be ERADICTED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson