Posted on 08/29/2007 4:59:22 AM PDT by PlainOleAmerican
Ron Paul supporters are fast making a name for themselves on the web. Not because they are just web savvy, but because they have proven themselves to be the best at hacking on-line polls, invalidating conservative polling data on behalf of their candidate. It seems that even Democrat 527 MoveOn.org is now onboard the Ron Paul anti-war train.
Despite the fact that presidential candidate Ron Paul can not score better than 3% in any legitimate national poll, his supporters claim he is “the conservative” candidate to beat in the 2008 Republican race for the White House. Despite his less than conservative voting record in congress and his Teddy Kennedy like position on the war on terror in Iraq, his supporters think he is the most “conservative” candidate in the race. How?
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalledger.com ...
I suppose you don't see he the beam in your own eye . . .
No set of numbers anywhere come close to even suggesting that Ron Paul can win anything other than Code Pink President...
So the fact that you think our choice is Ron Paul or Hillary Clinton is laughable...
Hillary Clinton WILL be President if conservatives do not unite behind an electable conservative, not some crackpot dope lovin libertarian isolationist who can’t get above 3% in any poll without his handful of liberal supporters spamming the poll.
Sure you do... MoveOn.org members are big benefactors of Soros money....
Did you read the bill?
LOL Well, of course a Paulistinian would say that. But it isn't silly to me, and of course, I'm the one who chooses who I will be voting for.
It looks like you didn’t change the year in the advanced search function. You ran the 2007 bills for the 110th congress, that bill was from 2001 for the 107th congress (Part of the NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2002)
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.2586:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c107:6:./temp/~c107XEBvyy::
may be the correct link, yours is not working.
Let 'em die. Help them die through defensive use of deadly force if in their drug induced stupor they decide to attack you or yours. Setting up a Nanny State to protect you only makes you, and all those around you, subject to compounding abuses that eventually destroy everything those before you fought and died for.
How did this same so called “core” in the GOP look at a Leftist kook like Guiliani and think putting a pro-abortion anti-gunner on the ticket was a “winning” deal?
Are they the same people that vote in the straw polls?
The “core” didn’t. The current crop of “moderate” Republicans “compassionate towards socialism” did.
When the American people start rejecting gifts from the treasury at the polls, politicians will stop buying votes with tax-payer funds. Until then, try to get elected without promising gifts from the treasury to someone...
The American people won’t elect a “real conservative” willing to take out our enemies and kick out our freeloaders.
Yep, all four of them!
Oh yeah, we're REELING here, just REELING.
MEDIC!
heh..no, actually he does pretty well in the straw polls. I just can't figure out why when he can't get 2% in the nationals.
He's not going to win, right? Fred is going to win, right?
I get sick of mudslinging.and half-truths. The article posted made clear, concise statements about Paul, and I wanted to hear clear honest rebuttal from Paul supporters. A couple here responded that way. I appreciate the opportunity to read what they have to say. There’s no danger of me voting for Paul, though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.