Replies

LOL. Nice try.

Running around the corner after a final bit of name calling is for 3rd graders, not for mature adults with reasoning abilities.

Your intial flippant remark was shown to be ludicrous on the face of it, while my post to which you objected was demonstrated to be clearly justifiable.

Rather than simply issuing a “touche,” you shifted gears and attempted to argue that nobody is supposed to hit the reply button on a response to an initial post, unless invited to do so.

I dealt with that, in detail, because you seem to have difficulty understanding what a public forum is all about. Further, I demonstrated that your argument was hypocritical on the face of it, because you were violating your own ill-reasoned response.

You countered with pure ad hominem attacks - suggesting my response was too passionate, and that I was taking things too seriously.

That was a deflection. You made no no attempt to address my argument as to why your second charge was all wrong, and you showed no ability to recognize your own hypcrosy.

You now admit that all you heard was “blah blah blah,” but chose to claim victory and that I wasn’t listening. I listened, and responded. You admitted that you chose not to hear (for very obvious reasons).

Precious. Your refusal to hear, or address my argument, is the moment that you were defeated. That you can’t admit it does not alter that fact.

I have a theory. My theory is that you’re an obsessive/compulsive a-hole with the tragic, desperate need to feel superior to everyone, and you just can’t stop yourself. I’m going to test my theory by stringing you along for a while in this thread and making you post a whole novel to each of my single lines. This should be fun.

Now, back to the discussion at hand: I, again, didn’t really read your whole last post, but I read the first couple of lines, and it became very obvious to me that you know you were wrong originally, and now you’re just trying to cover up that fact by engaging in a lot of meaningless personal insults.