Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bluefish
Half the *opinions* were "sh**house" psychiatry themselves. Once the religious judgement kicked in, I chose to counter.

Let me explain this to you s-l-o-w-l-y: The lady asked for the person's opinion. The previous poster gave it to her. However, that poster did not ask for YOUR opinion. Get the difference?
101 posted on 08/28/2007 11:54:13 PM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: fr_freak

Try reading this s-l-o-w-l-y yourself:

Stop your intellectually dishonest, hypocritical whining and get over yourself already.

I didn’t ask for YOUR opinion on my retort to what I saw as a silly statement either.

Yet you chose to stick your nose in, didn’t you?

The FR “rulebook” does not state that opinions can only be issued to an orginal poster, nor does it state that comments are not meant to be issued in response to replies.

This is a public forum. Anybody that posts, is open to rebuttals. Every comment has a Reply link.

You chose to use the reply button yourself, and your comment had nothing to do with the original post. Mine actually did. That makes you a hypocrite.

The original post itself was a silly vanity to begin with, so whatever problem you have is also silly.

I think the truth here is that you didn’t like my opinion, but can’t deal with it, so you’ve invented a reason to complain. Well, I don’t back down on stupid, irrational complaints.

Deal with the issue and content of my post to which you took issue with, or remain silent. Your issue with my post is patently absurd.


110 posted on 08/29/2007 12:34:25 AM PDT by bluefish (I'm Hillaryphobing...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson