This can only occur if economic conditions allow it and if social psychology is employed to convince and encourage women that having more children is the ‘new norm’.It's no wonder he doesn't want you posting anymore, those are powerful, scary and demeaning words he wrote (as were yours Lucysmom)...Sounds like reeducation camps to me.
Almost reminiscent of certain programs run by governments our soldiers defeated prior to the baby boom.
Oh I am posting more. But unlike you, I have a life. Frankly you are getting more attention from than you ever deserved.
Employing social psychology to convince and encourage is not ‘scary’ nor demeanng.
We are talking about women that want to have children or more children but who think it unwise for a variety of reasons, but mostly for economic reasons. If government cuts taxes on families and encourages more child bearing as is done in France, the birthrate will rise hopefully to a level that will keep entitlement programs for the elderly and disabled solvent.
Social psychology is simply the promotion of the view that ‘everybody’s doing it, we should to’. So if families feel more secure to have three or four children versus zero, one or two, that is the result of relieving them from the uncertainty surrounding them presently.
So once again you are reading something into words that does not exist, in this case you are twisting a simple government famly promotion program idea into something sinister.
Our government has promoted larger families in the past. It is one of the factors in the creation of the Baby Boom. Promoting something is not the same as forcing it. But your delusional reading will of course extrapolate ‘reeducation camps’ from the statement.