To: VOA
But you could see incremental improvement in everything the Japanese did with autos. The Chinese seem to be approaching things in a haphazard manner. Obviously they are unconscious of the PR impact of their blunders (killing household pets with poisoned dog food ingredients and putting lead paint on children’s toys?). I’m not sure they are on a path paralleling the Japanese yet.
55 posted on
08/28/2007 12:49:33 PM PDT by
Wally_Kalbacken
(Seldom right but never in doubt)
To: Wally_Kalbacken
See number 64. They aren't competing on quality. They are competing on sheer brawn. And winning, too.
69 posted on
08/28/2007 1:11:20 PM PDT by
JasonC
To: Wally_Kalbacken
“But you could see incremental improvement in everything the Japanese
did with autos.”
Yes.
The post-WWII Japanese had a number of advantages:
1. understanding of how to build/run a real “hard metal” industry
2. plenty of hungry people that were desperate to succeed
3. the luck of latching onto a quality-control guru...from the USA
To some degree China doesn’t have those factors.
And while they are (relatively) getting rich and fat from selling
junk to the USA...that sort of knocks the wind out of any attempt to
try to build real quality/safety into their autos.
(just my inexpert opinion)
70 posted on
08/28/2007 1:12:16 PM PDT by
VOA
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson