1 posted on
08/28/2007 11:06:32 AM PDT by
george76
To: rellimpank
2 posted on
08/28/2007 11:08:17 AM PDT by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: george76
If only they could create a barrier against liberals. Then they could sell it to Aspen, Crested Butte, Durango, and Paonia.
3 posted on
08/28/2007 11:10:40 AM PDT by
whipitgood
(Let's burn some MEXICAN flags!)
To: george76
Funny how liberal environmental wackos get some common sense when it is their houses on the line...
5 posted on
08/28/2007 11:16:41 AM PDT by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
To: george76
Rich liberals get firebreaks while they give money to groups who will sue if you try to build one.
Figures.
6 posted on
08/28/2007 11:16:53 AM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
To: george76
So cutting trees is OK to protect the part time houses of the limousine liberals, but it is improper to protect the proles?
7 posted on
08/28/2007 11:17:24 AM PDT by
PAR35
To: george76
Pine Beetles means too many trees-—more trees per acre than the average precipitation can sustain, thus dryer trees which are much more vulnerable to the beetles. The Trees they are cutting down now could have been logged all along, preventing the whole problem.
I’ve said it many times because it bears repeating....Environmentalists are BAD for the environment.
8 posted on
08/28/2007 11:20:47 AM PDT by
rottndog
(Government is a necessary evil, but as with all evils, the less of it the better.)
To: george76
Glad to see the Colorado Forest Service getting off their duffs.
We had an article in our newspaper yesterday quoting them as saying that they've given up fighting them on the southern end of the San Isabel National Forest.
They also said that the only cutting going on is being done by private land owners adjacent to the forest. They got that part right!
It's so bad down here now that they'd have to clear cut the whole forest.
To: george76
The mountain pine beetle epidemic has hit ...hard. Perhaps what is needed is the right pesticide.
To: george76
Wow!
A tip of the hat to “the powers that be” in Vail.
They’ve managed to manifest a level of sanity that is still in short
supply in Southern California.
(where a stange-bedfellows alliance of envirowackos and homeowners
leave the dead trees up for fuel during the next firestorm)
14 posted on
08/28/2007 11:27:07 AM PDT by
VOA
To: george76
some of the felled trees will go toward a “green” cause: biomass energy.I usually call it firewood myself, but I guess this now helps me speak "Liberal"
17 posted on
08/28/2007 11:30:26 AM PDT by
stevio
((NRA))
To: george76
All that habitat for creatures that depend upon standing deadwood ... how could they remove it? Where is the injunction? Oh, wait, Vail, hangout of the beautiful people. never mind.
25 posted on
08/28/2007 12:32:17 PM PDT by
NonValueAdded
(Brian J. Marotta, 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub, (1948-2007) Rest In Peace, our FRiend)
To: george76
The author's name is Ed Stoner. He-he.
26 posted on
08/28/2007 1:02:59 PM PDT by
Wally_Kalbacken
(Seldom right but never in doubt)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson