Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton: FDA Should Regulate Tobacco
Science Daily ^ | 8-27-2007

Posted on 08/27/2007 3:45:42 PM PDT by blam

Clinton: FDA should regulate tobacco

CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa, Aug. 27 (UPI) -- U.S. Sen. Hillary Clinton called for U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulation of tobacco and a national war on cancer.

The New York Democrat and presidential candidate made the remarks Monday at the Livestrong Presidential Cancer Form in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.

Clinton urged "a much more aggressive outreach. That's why I favor the FDA being able to regulate advertising about nicotine and tobacco products. And we're going to push through, I hope, a bill to get that done."

Such regulation would require an amendment to an old law. The Clinton-era FDA asserted the authority to regulate tobacco in 1996 but the tobacco companies challenged that authority in court. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2000's FDA et al vs. Brown & Williamson et al that the federal act creating the FDA didn't give it that authority.

Clinton said tobacco is "an addictive, deadly substance and we need to regulate it."

Clinton also praised local and state efforts to ban smoking in public places such as restaurants, but didn't endorse a national ban.

She accused the Bush administration of abandoning the "war on cancer."

"Between 1993 and 2001," she said, "we doubled the budgets for the National Institutes of Health and increased dramatically the funding going to the National Cancer Institute."

"The two priorities of this president have been the war in Iraq and tax cuts for the wealthy -- neither of which he's paid for -- while he has cut the budgets for the National Institutes of Health and the National Cancer Institute."

She said another major goal should be "affordable healthcare for every single American because that goes hand in hand with the war against cancer."

Clinton said U.S. President George Bush also has frustrated stem cell research.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; fda; govwatch; nannystate; pufflist; regulate; tobacco
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 08/27/2007 3:45:53 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam

ANYTHING to subdue the BATFE works for me.


2 posted on 08/27/2007 3:47:55 PM PDT by Unknowing (Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Cliton also says the government should regulate: breathing, dreams, aspirations, all education, religion, life, liberty, heterosexual sex within marriage, number of children permitted, age of death, child discipline . . . . . .


3 posted on 08/27/2007 3:51:33 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Clinton said tobacco is "an addictive, deadly substance and we need to regulate it."

You could start with your hubby.... and lead by example.

4 posted on 08/27/2007 3:54:42 PM PDT by LaineyDee (Don't mess with Texas wimmen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unknowing

There are those who would like to see gun “violence” listed as a health problem.


5 posted on 08/27/2007 3:55:05 PM PDT by beelzepug ("One should never ascribe to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

The FDA can’t even control the tainted products coming in from China. They don’t have the time for this!


6 posted on 08/27/2007 3:56:00 PM PDT by acoulterfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whee The People; Raycpa

Here’s your hero in action go vote for her.


7 posted on 08/27/2007 3:56:20 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

“U.S. Food and Drug Administration regulation of tobacco and a national war on cancer”

Because you know? None of us would even know to fight cancer if Shrillary didn’t come to guide us....because, of course, without her we’re INVISIBLE....

Regulate tobacco HOW? We’re already considered the scum of the earth in most places.

Shut up, Shrillary.


8 posted on 08/27/2007 3:56:27 PM PDT by Right Cal Gal (Remember Billy Dale!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Why doesn’t she call for an outright ban? We all know why.


9 posted on 08/27/2007 3:57:39 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Unknowing

Libs never have the guts to go for the jugular. They always have to nickel and dime folks with regulation and for the children.... If Clinton feels that tobacco is that bad then ban the damn product from the market. Of course she won’t because that’ll dry the cigarette revenues to help pay for her socialist programs.


10 posted on 08/27/2007 3:58:52 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Right Cal Gal

It’s crazy her supporters
; they want to legalize pot, but outlaw tobacco..figure that one out..!


11 posted on 08/27/2007 3:58:53 PM PDT by JSDude1 (Republicans if the don't beware ARE the new WHIGS! (all empty hairpieces..) :).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LaineyDee

tobacco is no more deadly than fastfood, not exercising, lack of sleep, or popping a pill for every ache and pain.


12 posted on 08/27/2007 3:59:42 PM PDT by LukeL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam

Sure, let’s regulate the heck out of another industry. We have so few left anyway. On the other hand, maybe the tobacco growers wouldn’t need so much cheap labor, so the illegal.........

Aw, never mind.


13 posted on 08/27/2007 4:00:26 PM PDT by Paperdoll ( Vote for Duncan Hunter in the Primaries for America's sake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Nanny statism.


14 posted on 08/27/2007 4:02:11 PM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Regulate tobacco? As I understand current law, bringing tobacco under the law would require that it be “safe and effective.” Although tobacco (in cigarettes) is an “effective” delivery mechanism for nicotine, it cannot be considered “safe” in the same sense of that word as is applied to other drugs seeking FDA approval.

Point being, “regulate,” in this context, is just Hillarese for “ban.”


15 posted on 08/27/2007 4:03:04 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

This idiot would regulate everything she could—and tax it too.


16 posted on 08/27/2007 4:05:36 PM PDT by BamaAndy (Heart & Iron; ISBN 1-4137-5397-3.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Hey Cankles:

Why don’t you call for an investigation into where all those billions in “tobacco reparations” dollars went off to?
A couple hundred billboards and thousands of pamphlets? Gov’t got BILLIONS...where the hell is that money???? The Dems need to answer those questions first.

p.s. Stay out of my business, you ugly witch.

17 posted on 08/27/2007 4:06:26 PM PDT by ishabibble (ALL-AMERICAN INFIDEL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

The FDA should regulate who gets into DEMOCRAT offices!


18 posted on 08/27/2007 4:07:11 PM PDT by gidget7 ( Vote for the Arsenal of Democracy, because America RUNS on Duncan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
"Cliton also says the government should regulate: breathing, dreams, aspirations, all education, religion, life, liberty, heterosexual sex within marriage, number of children permitted, age of death, child discipline . . . . . "

Cliton, "Well, we'll just have to change human nature."

yitbos

19 posted on 08/27/2007 4:11:27 PM PDT by bruinbirdman ("Those who control language control minds." -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1
they want to legalize pot, but outlaw tobacco..figure that one out..!

Well, they will put a filter on the joint for your protection.

20 posted on 08/27/2007 4:12:05 PM PDT by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson