[bajabaja]

The logic of the insurer is to halt a public investigation of a public wrong so that the financial damages will be more easily limited. So a private insurer (which knowingly insured a public entity) has the power to stop (or suggest) that a public investigation be HALTED? THAT IN ITSELF is a denial of civil rights. Disgust. Utter Disgust. Don’t these folks learn anything? Ever?

[Ready4Freddy]

No suggest - it's in the policy. Durham has the right to continue, of course. AIG has the right to cancel coverage if they don't.

So a private insurer (which knowingly insured a public entity) has the power to stop (or suggest) that a public investigation be HALTED?