[stand watie]

given that you posted a "source" in post 588 that is DECEPTIVE at best & an OUTRIGHT LIE at worst, WHY should you be believed about ANY source????

have you been "taking lessons" from "bubba, the LIAR"??? (laughing AT you.)

free dixie,sw

[Non-Sequitur]

given that you posted a "source" in post 588 that is DECEPTIVE at best & an OUTRIGHT LIE at worst, WHY should you be believed about ANY source????

Are you saying that the Constitution does not contain an Article III, Section 2? Or that section does not contain a clause 1 or clause 2? Are you admitting that you haven't the faintest idea of what 'jurisdiction' means? Or are you just demonstrating your general ignorance?