Replies

More objective than the MSM driven polls conducted on landline phones to senior citizens.

Tell you what. You fund your own random-sampling polling with a reputable polling company asking "if the election were held today, who would you vote for" with a list of all candidates. Sample a 1000; sample 10,000 if you want. Choose the days and times. Feel free to moniter the results. Do it for each state. I guaran-damn-tee you Ron Paul will not get 50-plus percent of the vote in any state, and Kucinich will not be the top vote-getter of the Democrats.

When the actual votes come in the primaries and Ron Paul doesn't get come anywhere close to winning the primary, the only vote that really matters, will there be more cries of fraud?

Here's my counter, counter, counter proposal.

Have the same sample of people register their cell phone numbers or email addresses and have a reputable polling firm ask them who would they support for President. Guarantee you Paul would be right up in the top three.

Obsolete polling methods currently being pushed by the socialist media and trumpeted as gospel by myopic FReepers, who just a few years ago applied the Barf Alert to these very same polls when the results didn't favor their beloved President Bush means that I would rather trust an online poll in which the wording of the question is clear and objective & the results instantaneously over some stupid poll produced by a low-level slacker doodling cartoons during his break in the New York Times building.