Replies

"This poll proves the point that is so forcefully made here."

Please tell us you have more sense than to think this poll is scientific, or meaningful!

Ron Paul obviously got a bunch of his followers to load-up this poll -
Was there a link to it on "Nutjob.com?"

Ron Paul obviously got a bunch of his followers to load-up this poll - Was there a link to it on "Nutjob.com?"

Actually, SJackson posted an earlier copy of the same poll when Kucinich was holding the lead by a small margin. SJackson wanted everyone to believe Kucinich actually had more support than Ron Paul. Then, apparently, the Paulian Horde noticed it.

You know, early on, our various blogs and such would mention these online polls. Now, no mention is made. But our chat groups and such apparently are blasting through them all on their own.

You do know that we are well over 30,000 registered activists now and approaching 40,000? So this is actually a middling result, not a true measure of what we could do if we really cared about ~~FReeping~~ spamming online polls.

IOW, this is what we can do without even trying.

And despite the millions spent, none of the other candidates can summon a fraction of this kind of grassroots commitment consistently. That's not a sign there's something wrong with Ron Paul. It's a sign there's something wrong with where the other GOP candidates stand on the issues.