Replies

Kind of hard to be “strong defense” when as a candidate, Paul proposes a CUT/RUN & SURRENDER strategy just like a LIEberal DUmocrat.

Please re-read my post. Paul has always supported the military and Reagan's defense build-up. Just because he doesn't support the Iraq war now doesn't mean he's an anti-war moonbat.

His words play right into the enemies hands and they’d just love for the US to elect a weak-kneed RINO.

And those enemies would be demolished if we were to get hit again under Paul. There would be no nation-building, no "international community" or "spreading democracy" crapola. Terrorists would be killed, period.

By the way, where’s the fence that Ronnie Paul built? How about the anti-illegal immigration bills? Actions speak much louder than empty rhetoric, especially from a RINO LIEbertarian.

Sorry to burst your bubble but Paul has always been an opponent of illegal immigration by voting to deny them access to our social services and other handouts. He supports a militarized border - that means he wants the Army on the border and not Border Patrol agents. And not just a neighborhood suburban fence that Hunter supports.

I don’t base my vote on Clinton....any REAL conservative would beat either. It’s when you put up squishy moderates and empty suit RINOs when the party fractures. Guess some will never learn the lessons of 1992 and 1996.

Ron Paul is a true conservative. To say otherwise is simply lashing out in desperation.

My support and my vote will be based on the STRONGEST conservative candidate in the race. Paul’s record doesn’t even come close.

I'm sure your support of Hunter will raise his totals from .00001% to .0001%.

Paul said “GET OUT NOW” when asked about Iraq....he doesn’t need any spin on that. It is CUT & RUN, same as when a DUmocrat says it.

Nice try, but anyone who supports cut and run in the middle of a war is less than a serious candidate. Also went over and beyond kooksville...”War was never declared, we went in illegally”.

Keep living in dreamland...and say hi to your MoveOn friends while you’re at it.

The DUmbass also had the nerve to say Saddam had nothing to do with terrorism....

More about Saddam’s “never found” WMDs....and their delivery systems:

http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID={6C7E3B44-6D0A-4521-AEBD-B9D36CA01BD5}

http://www.probush.com/ryan_wmd_question.htm

http://media.www.dailylobo.com/media/storage/paper344/news/2007/04/18/Opinion/Good-News.In.Iraq.Doesnt.Get.Proper.Media.Coverage-2849474.shtml