Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ejonesie22; karsten5
Hey Paul guys, I thought you were trying to convince us that his support from the left was a fluke or whatever, that his bend against the war was on Constitutional grounds, not a defeatist stance.

We have never denied that we have many Libertarians, independents and a fair number of Democrats among the Ron Paul supporters.

It actually looks like the kind of demographic spread you need to actually win the White House. I assume you're complaining because the other Republican candidates don't have such broad appeal.

And if we're going to have thread about Karsten Nicholson, then what's wrong with Karsten Nicholson actually being here on the thread? Admittedly, I was beginning to think the dim-bulb Paul-haters weren't even going to notice, hence my "welcome to FR" for Karsten.
320 posted on 08/26/2007 7:34:23 PM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies ]


To: George W. Bush
I have absolutely no problem with it, indeed appreciate the effort.

It proves what we have said about Paul all along. He is anti war period, just drop all the “Constitutional” pretense and get on with it.

And this is nowhere near the type of coalition that Reagan had. The Reagan Dems were conservative in their philosophy, not some rag tag group of people from the extreme left and right.

328 posted on 08/26/2007 7:40:19 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson