Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: T.L.Sink

My husband has very strong opinions on this issue. I won’t use his language about it LOL. But generally, his biggest beef is this:

A WM can feasibly continue getting pregnant on a certain time line and be completely exempt from a PFT, which a male is required to consistenly improve on in order to get promoted. As a woman, I also think this is unfair, because it happens waaaayyyy more than anyone would like to admit. It is completely wrong, IMO, for a woman to be eligible for promotions under different criteria. That is NOT equality.


6 posted on 08/26/2007 10:09:30 AM PDT by USMCWife6869 (Godspeed Sand Sharks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: USMCWife6869

Likewise in the real world, Mr. & Mrs Marine. Our medium-sized factory, owned by a multi-global corp, had a laughable 50% female hiring goal some time ago. These days, it’s 20% female hire/train/promote/retain. They pay lower annual bonuses to the bosses who don’t promote “enough” women, and even brag about this in various trade publications and women’s magazines!


7 posted on 08/26/2007 11:51:33 AM PDT by flowerplough (Oh, Marge, trying is just the first step toward failure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson