Replies

Dennis Kucinich Beating Ron Paul in Online Poll

Freeping polls is how we got our name as Freepers here at FR. The DUmmies and the Kos bunch have finally caught on and are doing the same thing. These polls don't mean that much unless you're looking at one that follows a major political event and even then they're too easy to spam.

Strangely enough, just when Ron Paul has had a string of actual straw poll victories, you choose to post about some meaningless online poll that is usually controlled by whose supporters find it first.

I visited USAElectionPolls.com and your cited poll showing a head-to-head on their page. As usual, your posts are nothing but lies. You had to resort to quoting some confused obscure message board as your little news source before the Paulian Horde arrived at that poll to represent the true levels of online support.

Who do you want to see as president? (Reps and Dems)

Rudy Giuliani 2% (38)
Fred Thompson 1% (18)
Mitt Romney 3% (68)
John McCain 0% (7)
Newt Gingrich 0% (10)
Mike Huckabee 1% (30)
Ron Paul 52% (1152)
Tom Tancredo 0% (3)
Sam Brownback 0% (3)
Duncan Hunter 0% (4)
Barack Obama 9% (203)
John Edwards 2% (40)
Hillary Clinton 4% (90)
Bill Richardson 1% (18)
Dennis Kucinich 20% (448)
Joe Biden 1% (15)
Mike Gravel 1% (17)
Chris Dodd 0% (5)
Al Gore 2% (40)

Your posts are systematic in their use of innuendo and third-party misquotes which you can then attribute as truth. You rely upon the laziness of FReepers to believe your little lies so you can spread your FUD.

For a candidate you claim to be so marginal, you certainly jump through hoops to try to lie about him by quoting "others". You're pathetic and post disinformation routinely.

Your own news threads are all suspect when you have established such a history of deliberate dishonesty.

I thought I should repost SJackson's post and my own response and flag all of you to it.

SJackson,
Post #39
Since we're discussing moonbat candidates, that makes sense. After all, like Paul, Dennis is winning the moonbat vote.

Dennis Kucinich Beating Ron Paul in Online Poll
http://www.transworldnews.com/NewsStory.aspx?storyid=21531&ret=Default.aspx

Washington D.C. 8/25/2007 9:59 AM GMT (FINDITT)
USAElectionPolls.com is currently holding an online straw poll on the front page of its website. The questions is worded "Who do you want to see as president? (Reps and Dems)".
Dennis Kucinich is leading the Democrats by a 3:1 margin over Barack Obama.
Ron Paul has a commanding 5:1 lead over Mitt Romney.
If it was a head to head bout, Dennis Kucinich would be beating Internet Phenom Ron Paul.
Go to http://www.usaelectionpolls.com.

Notice how SJackson posts a false and misleading result from an obscure website. Although providing a link to the real online poll page, SJackson relies on the laziness of FReepers to fall for her little trick.

Here's the real online poll result:

Who do you want to see as president? (Reps and Dems)

Rudy Giuliani 2% (38)
Fred Thompson 1% (18)
Mitt Romney 3% (68)
John McCain 0% (7)
Newt Gingrich 0% (10)
Mike Huckabee 1% (30)
Ron Paul 52% (1152)
Tom Tancredo 0% (3)
Sam Brownback 0% (3)
Duncan Hunter 0% (4)
Barack Obama 9% (203)
John Edwards 2% (40)
Hillary Clinton 4% (90)
Bill Richardson 1% (18)
Dennis Kucinich 20% (448)
Joe Biden 1% (15)
Mike Gravel 1% (17)
Chris Dodd 0% (5)
Al Gore 2% (40)

I thought it was worth pointing out how SJackson and the other Paul-haters routinely use misleading quotes from obscure websites to trash Ron Paul. It shows how desperate and dishonest they really are. Well, if the malicious keyword spamming they engage in isn't enough to tip readers off to begin with.

As usual, when her trick is exposed (as she has been so many times before), SJackson will feign indignant righteousness, pretending that she didn't know and click through. Of course, when someone like SJackson has done this exact same trick dozens of times on countless threads with her little crew of Paul-haters, the denials become pretty hard to believe. Any ordinary person who examines such a post would conclude that SJackson is a deliberate smearer who has no interest in the truth.

It doesn't get much more dishonest than this. But I'm sure the Paul-haters are just waiting for another chance to smear Ron Paul as they have done so many times before. This is part and parcel of the tactics of the Paul-haters, hence my flag to the rest of you.