Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/26/2007 6:30:19 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: SJackson

Paul: The GOP’s Jimmy Carter.


2 posted on 08/26/2007 6:38:19 AM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

So while Ron Paul may be considered an unelectable kook, he will still get many more votes than a true Libertarian?


3 posted on 08/26/2007 6:38:55 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
So that's who it is...J.J. Jackson.
Thanks for posting this. You made things much easier.
5 posted on 08/26/2007 6:47:37 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Well, this just makes me want to vote for Rudi, now.

Whoever wrote this writes as if he’s a condescending dick. I love how he has the attitude that he’s so much smarter than everyone else and has to tech them a lesson. What an a-hole.


6 posted on 08/26/2007 7:06:12 AM PDT by MichiganConservative (Step 1: Grind up baby. Step 2: smear on stretch marks. Step 3: two problems solved! Be happy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1883226/posts


7 posted on 08/26/2007 7:10:07 AM PDT by MichiganConservative (Step 1: Grind up baby. Step 2: smear on stretch marks. Step 3: two problems solved! Be happy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
I'm sure you're really making an effort but if this is supposed to give anybody serioiusly considering supporting Ron Paul a reason to walk away from his candidacy I think you'll have to try a little harder.

Ron Paul gets my vote for a lot of reasons. His belief in small government, low taxes, individual freedoms and a strong national defense centered on America's interests and the recognition that the reason our armed forces exist is to defend the US and not wander around the world looking for trouble or maintaining large permanent forces overseas are all reflected in a consistent voting record that nobody else in Washington can begin to approach all, along with a host of other issues, make him my clear choice.

As far as his requests for earmarks or assistance for his district are concerned I can't pretend to know what he has, and perhaps even more important, hasn't sought. FWIW, I've been active in politics at the federal level for over thirty years and constituent requests are a fact of life. Some have merit, some don't, but they're never in short supply.

8 posted on 08/26/2007 7:15:17 AM PDT by caltrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Liberty Reborn is the official website of J.J. Jackson.
  Mr. Jackson's writings are pro America and defend the concepts of individual liberty, unalienable rights stemming from God, and the concepts of limited government set forth in the United States Constitution and Declaration of Independence.

[His writings are fine except when he gets off on a hissy fit about Ron Paul, also a defender of the concepts of individual liberty, unalienable rights, and limited government.]

  His writings are generally what are considered 'conservative' or 'libertarian' in nature and while Mr. Jackson accepts the term conservative as a label he prefers to be known as a libertarian or a constitutionalist.

[Too bad he taints his own credentials as a libertarian/ constitutionalist by nitpicking at Ron Paul's]

Liberty reborn contains past articles written by J.J. Jackson, information about sites that currently publish his work, how you can publish his work on you own site, and assorted other information.
  You agree that by reading this site you hold Mr. Jackson completely NOT responsible for any mental anguish you may suffer from reading an opinion that your brain may not be able to comprehend or handle.

Reading his site convinces me that JJ is suffering from a great deal of mental anguish and envy due to Paul's successes as a candidate. - Tough noooogies.

9 posted on 08/26/2007 7:17:27 AM PDT by tpaine (" My most important function on the Supreme Court is to tell the majority to take a walk." -Scalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
"This defense is like saying that a man who robs a 7-11 for $50 and gives it to his mother to pay for her hospital bills is less guilty of theft than a man who holds up the bank, takes $1,000,000 and flees to the Bahamas."

If you deliberately violate one law, you're guilty of violating all of them, according to an ancient saying. I agree, there are no degrees of guilt or pregnancy.

10 posted on 08/26/2007 7:23:29 AM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: soccermom; Allegra

Ping.


15 posted on 08/26/2007 7:42:06 AM PDT by elhombrelibre (Democrats have plenty of patience for anti-American dictators but none for Iraqi democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson; Allegra; Mr. Silverback
No amount of hurling slurs like “neo-con” or “fascist” or “globalist” at those that exposed Mr. Paul will make a difference in the truth. Such tactics don’t work for liberals and they will not work for you.

BUMP! ;)

41 posted on 08/26/2007 8:25:54 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("Proudly keeping one iron boot on the necks of libertarian faux 'conservatives' since 1958!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Another blatantly dishonest article from you. Hardly surprising.

The article doesn't mention how many of Ron Paul's earmarks ever get funded. That's because they don't get funded.

Produce proof that any of Ron Paul's earmarks have passed the relevant budget committees and made it past reconciliation.

But then, that would spoil your entire little ongoing trollfest, wouldn't it? Because there are no Ron Paul earmarks that have been funded. We can find plenty of others for House leaders and committee chairmen and the senior minority leaders on the committees. But none for Ron Paul.

Produce these earmarks.
52 posted on 08/26/2007 9:19:18 AM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson; DreamsofPolycarp; The_Eaglet; Irontank; Gamecock; elkfersupper; dcwusmc; gnarledmaw; ...

Ron Paul campaign website

Ron's weekly message [5 minutes audio, every Monday]
PodcastWeekly archive • Toll-free 888-322-1414 •
Free Republic Ron Paul Ping List: Join/Leave


Another blatantly dishonest attack on Ron Paul earmarks which simply do not exist.
53 posted on 08/26/2007 9:21:26 AM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

>>If you want to spend money on studying shrimp then use the amendment process to make such idiotic spending constitutional. Otherwise you are just a hack like any other politician would be who espoused certain beliefs while acting contradictory to them.<<

That’s what the “unconstitutional spending” knock on Paul is?

The Federal government regulates interstate commerce. Studying a big industry that generates a lot of interstate trade is really low on my list of problems with the candidates.


59 posted on 08/26/2007 9:32:16 AM PDT by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Tooo funny, I think the comedy channel is now hiring, maybe you can get Jon Stewart a cup of coffee, you have a real skill here....


62 posted on 08/26/2007 9:39:51 AM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
with regards to the Constitution; for it or against it. There is no “mostly”. Yes, you can certainly disagree with parts of it, but you still have to abide by it. It’s the law of the land so deal with it.

While it's easy to agree with that statement, it's all about interpretation isn't it? That's the reason for abortion on demand, gun laws and a host of welfare programs. Liberals finding new meaning every day in the constitution as a "living document".

66 posted on 08/26/2007 9:50:15 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

You need to find a different hobby. Your Paul-hating borders on clinical neurosis.


90 posted on 08/26/2007 11:21:43 AM PDT by NCSteve (I am not arguing with you - I am telling you. -- James Whistler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

Tell J.J. I thank him for his comments. I don't agree with his views.

92 posted on 08/26/2007 11:33:06 AM PDT by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
Prior to Mr. Paul’s propensity for unconstitutional spending becoming widely known

Haha! Stopped right there. Hard to tell the antiPaulies from the Democrats anymore. What a bunch of loons.

117 posted on 08/26/2007 1:52:32 PM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson

It’s really amazing.

So many are so threatened by Dr. Paul’s campaign........


120 posted on 08/26/2007 1:59:18 PM PDT by WhiteGuy (PAUL2008 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SJackson
"...Paul Collective..."

I'm a Paul supporter, but some of the terms coming out of this race are too funny.

Is there someone out there with computer skills that can fit a nice picture of Ron Paul over a cube and place it with stars in the background? That would be hilarious. The Paul Collective. You shall be assimilated. Good luck. We are having hard enough time assimilating the Mexicans.

122 posted on 08/26/2007 3:09:15 PM PDT by Jason_b (Click jason_b to the left here and read something about People v. De La Guerra 40 Cal. 311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson