1 posted on
08/26/2007 6:30:19 AM PDT by
SJackson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: SJackson
Paul: The GOP’s Jimmy Carter.
2 posted on
08/26/2007 6:38:19 AM PDT by
Rudder
To: SJackson
So while Ron Paul may be considered an unelectable kook, he will still get many more votes than a true Libertarian?
To: SJackson
So that's who it is...J.J. Jackson.
Thanks for posting this. You made things much easier.
To: SJackson
Well, this just makes me want to vote for Rudi, now.
Whoever wrote this writes as if he’s a condescending dick. I love how he has the attitude that he’s so much smarter than everyone else and has to tech them a lesson. What an a-hole.
6 posted on
08/26/2007 7:06:12 AM PDT by
MichiganConservative
(Step 1: Grind up baby. Step 2: smear on stretch marks. Step 3: two problems solved! Be happy!)
To: SJackson
7 posted on
08/26/2007 7:10:07 AM PDT by
MichiganConservative
(Step 1: Grind up baby. Step 2: smear on stretch marks. Step 3: two problems solved! Be happy!)
To: SJackson
I'm sure you're really making an effort but if this is supposed to give anybody serioiusly considering supporting Ron Paul a reason to walk away from his candidacy I think you'll have to try a little harder.
Ron Paul gets my vote for a lot of reasons. His belief in small government, low taxes, individual freedoms and a strong national defense centered on America's interests and the recognition that the reason our armed forces exist is to defend the US and not wander around the world looking for trouble or maintaining large permanent forces overseas are all reflected in a consistent voting record that nobody else in Washington can begin to approach all, along with a host of other issues, make him my clear choice.
As far as his requests for earmarks or assistance for his district are concerned I can't pretend to know what he has, and perhaps even more important, hasn't sought. FWIW, I've been active in politics at the federal level for over thirty years and constituent requests are a fact of life. Some have merit, some don't, but they're never in short supply.
8 posted on
08/26/2007 7:15:17 AM PDT by
caltrop
To: SJackson
Liberty Reborn is the official website of J.J. Jackson.
Mr. Jackson's writings are pro America and defend the concepts of individual liberty, unalienable rights stemming from God, and the concepts of limited government set forth in the United States Constitution and Declaration of Independence. [His writings are fine except when he gets off on a hissy fit about Ron Paul, also a defender of the concepts of individual liberty, unalienable rights, and limited government.]
His writings are generally what are considered 'conservative' or 'libertarian' in nature and while Mr. Jackson accepts the term conservative as a label he prefers to be known as a libertarian or a constitutionalist.
[Too bad he taints his own credentials as a libertarian/ constitutionalist by nitpicking at Ron Paul's]
Liberty reborn contains past articles written by J.J. Jackson, information about sites that currently publish his work, how you can publish his work on you own site, and assorted other information.
You agree that by reading this site you hold Mr. Jackson completely NOT responsible for any mental anguish you may suffer from reading an opinion that your brain may not be able to comprehend or handle.
Reading his site convinces me that JJ is suffering from a great deal of mental anguish and envy due to Paul's successes as a candidate. - Tough noooogies.
9 posted on
08/26/2007 7:17:27 AM PDT by
tpaine
(" My most important function on the Supreme Court is to tell the majority to take a walk." -Scalia)
To: SJackson
"This defense is like saying that a man who robs a 7-11 for $50 and gives it to his mother to pay for her hospital bills is less guilty of theft than a man who holds up the bank, takes $1,000,000 and flees to the Bahamas." If you deliberately violate one law, you're guilty of violating all of them, according to an ancient saying. I agree, there are no degrees of guilt or pregnancy.
To: soccermom; Allegra
15 posted on
08/26/2007 7:42:06 AM PDT by
elhombrelibre
(Democrats have plenty of patience for anti-American dictators but none for Iraqi democrats.)
To: SJackson; Allegra; Mr. Silverback
No amount of hurling slurs like neo-con or fascist or globalist at those that exposed Mr. Paul will make a difference in the truth. Such tactics dont work for liberals and they will not work for you.BUMP! ;)
41 posted on
08/26/2007 8:25:54 AM PDT by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("Proudly keeping one iron boot on the necks of libertarian faux 'conservatives' since 1958!")
To: SJackson
Another blatantly dishonest article from you. Hardly surprising.
The article doesn't mention how many of Ron Paul's earmarks ever get funded. That's because they don't get funded.
Produce proof that any of Ron Paul's earmarks have passed the relevant budget committees and made it past reconciliation.
But then, that would spoil your entire little ongoing trollfest, wouldn't it? Because there are no Ron Paul earmarks that have been funded. We can find plenty of others for House leaders and committee chairmen and the senior minority leaders on the committees. But none for Ron Paul.
Produce these earmarks.
52 posted on
08/26/2007 9:19:18 AM PDT by
George W. Bush
(Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
To: SJackson; DreamsofPolycarp; The_Eaglet; Irontank; Gamecock; elkfersupper; dcwusmc; gnarledmaw; ...
![](http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa247/frgeorgewbush/Ron%20Paul/RPphoto-small.jpg) |
![](http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa247/frgeorgewbush/Ron%20Paul/4x4.gif)
![](http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa247/frgeorgewbush/Ron%20Paul/4x4.gif) ![Ron Paul 2008 website Ron Paul campaign website](http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa247/frgeorgewbush/Ron%20Paul/RP-HopeForAmerica-banner.gif) ![](http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa247/frgeorgewbush/Ron%20Paul/4x4.gif)
![](http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa247/frgeorgewbush/Ron%20Paul/4x4.gif) Ron's weekly message [5 minutes audio, every Monday] • Podcast • Weekly archive • Toll-free 888-322-1414 • |
![Ron Paul At Meetup.com](http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa247/frgeorgewbush/Ron%20Paul/icon-meetup.gif) ![Ron Paul at YouTube.com](http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa247/frgeorgewbush/Ron%20Paul/icon-youtube.gif) ![Ron Paul at Eventful.com - Schedule/Events/Demands](http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa247/frgeorgewbush/Ron%20Paul/icon-eventful.gif) ![Ron Paul at MySpace.com](http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa247/frgeorgewbush/Ron%20Paul/icon-myspace.gif) ![Ron Paul at Facebook.com](http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa247/frgeorgewbush/Ron%20Paul/icon-facebook.gif) ![Ron Paul at Digg.com](http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa247/frgeorgewbush/Ron%20Paul/icon-digg.gif)
|
Free Republic Ron Paul Ping List: Join/Leave |
Another blatantly dishonest attack on Ron Paul earmarks which simply do not exist.
53 posted on
08/26/2007 9:21:26 AM PDT by
George W. Bush
(Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
To: SJackson
>>If you want to spend money on studying shrimp then use the amendment process to make such idiotic spending constitutional. Otherwise you are just a hack like any other politician would be who espoused certain beliefs while acting contradictory to them.<<
That’s what the “unconstitutional spending” knock on Paul is?
The Federal government regulates interstate commerce. Studying a big industry that generates a lot of interstate trade is really low on my list of problems with the candidates.
59 posted on
08/26/2007 9:32:16 AM PDT by
gondramB
(Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words)
To: SJackson
Tooo funny, I think the comedy channel is now hiring, maybe you can get Jon Stewart a cup of coffee, you have a real skill here....
62 posted on
08/26/2007 9:39:51 AM PDT by
padre35
(Conservative in Exile.)
To: SJackson
with regards to the Constitution; for it or against it. There is no mostly. Yes, you can certainly disagree with parts of it, but you still have to abide by it. Its the law of the land so deal with it. While it's easy to agree with that statement, it's all about interpretation isn't it? That's the reason for abortion on demand, gun laws and a host of welfare programs. Liberals finding new meaning every day in the constitution as a "living document".
66 posted on
08/26/2007 9:50:15 AM PDT by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: SJackson
You need to find a different hobby. Your Paul-hating borders on clinical neurosis.
90 posted on
08/26/2007 11:21:43 AM PDT by
NCSteve
(I am not arguing with you - I am telling you. -- James Whistler)
To: SJackson
![](http://www.tvparty.com/vgifs13/jjbig.jpg)
Tell J.J. I thank him for his comments. I don't agree with his views.
92 posted on
08/26/2007 11:33:06 AM PDT by
Eric Blair 2084
(Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
To: SJackson
Prior to Mr. Paul’s propensity for unconstitutional spending becoming widely known Haha! Stopped right there. Hard to tell the antiPaulies from the Democrats anymore. What a bunch of loons.
117 posted on
08/26/2007 1:52:32 PM PDT by
Sandy
To: SJackson
It’s really amazing.
So many are so threatened by Dr. Paul’s campaign........
120 posted on
08/26/2007 1:59:18 PM PDT by
WhiteGuy
(PAUL2008 -)
To: SJackson
"...Paul Collective..."
I'm a Paul supporter, but some of the terms coming out of this race are too funny.
Is there someone out there with computer skills that can fit a nice picture of Ron Paul over a cube and place it with stars in the background? That would be hilarious. The Paul Collective. You shall be assimilated. Good luck. We are having hard enough time assimilating the Mexicans.
122 posted on
08/26/2007 3:09:15 PM PDT by
Jason_b
(Click jason_b to the left here and read something about People v. De La Guerra 40 Cal. 311)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson