Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Asterisk-Free Libertarianism--The Constitution For Dummies (i.e. Ron Paul Supporters)
Liberty Reborm ^ | 8-26-07 | JJ Jackson

Posted on 08/26/2007 6:30:16 AM PDT by SJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-158 next last
To: George W. Bush
For a candidate you claim to be so marginal, you certainly jump through hoops to try to lie about him by quoting "others". You're pathetic and post disinformation routinely.

Well said, GWB - clapping hands here.

81 posted on 08/26/2007 10:50:32 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: billbears

Only this time billbears, the Islamacists are attacking us throughout the globe, we cannot, indeed should not, merely pull stumps with a “lotsa luck ‘raqi’s, you’ll figure it out after the genocide is finished”.

That is were IMO, Ron Paul falls down so to speak, like it or not, we do have national interests in Iraq, and we also have a moral obligation not to leave the place in such a state.


82 posted on 08/26/2007 10:50:53 AM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
They attempt to get someone to say someone about 9/11 Trutherism or something antisemitic so they all hit Abuse. This is a standard tactic they have adopted. The pattern is quite clear. Notice how they have to keep introducing the subject on thread after thread, whether there is any Truther/antisemitic content or not. Notice how they spam the keywords, again, this is part of their deliberate ongoing smear campaign.

Nice, so special. It figures.

83 posted on 08/26/2007 10:54:30 AM PDT by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Is it necessary to use the ping list three different times for the same thread?
84 posted on 08/26/2007 10:56:20 AM PDT by NapkinUser ("The House will pass S1348 and the president will sign it into law. It's a done deal." -B. Chezwick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Admittedly, I didn’t take the time to wade through the whole bunch of poorly written verbiage, and admittedly, I’m not a Paul-Bot, so I really shouldn’t speak on their behalf, and I have not read all of the replies, but I have to get to work...and that’s typical for FR, right?

I don’t think that there’s any problem in Congressman Paul’s behavior when we look at the details. He proposes earmarks—as a representative of his district, at the constituents’ request—and then he votes against spending. When a bucket of money is approved by Congress against his votes, is it wrong of him to then try to get that money applied to the most appropriate projectrs, including a share in his district? (Actually, it seems that most of his support goes for Federal projects outside his district.) Just because he loses the vote against pork, is it more “Constitutional” to just sit out the allocation of funds? I say not.

Also, if there’s no importance in being “more” Constitutional than the others, then what’s the big deal with Constitution-shredding Rudy Giuliani or Hillary Clinton? I think that intelligent people understand that there are degrees that are important.


85 posted on 08/26/2007 10:57:08 AM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker
Has he apologized for blaming the USA for 9-11 yet?

Have you read any of the corrections to your claim yet? Or are you going to keep spamming this lie?

86 posted on 08/26/2007 10:58:11 AM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser
Is it necessary to use the ping list three different times for the same thread?

Sorry, I'm probably messing up your My Comments page.

I thought that due to the repeated dishonest posting and baiting tactics the Paul-haters use, we need to start pointing it out. I've seen people use a lot of time and effort to repudiate these false posts and these tactics. I thought it was important for everyone on the pinglist to see exactly how the Paul-haters operate, who they are, who some of them truly support, the anti-FReeper forums some of them belong to, etc.

Many of the Paul-haters are not what they appear to be. They are FUDsters and rely on people's laziness to believe their lies and distortions. I think everyone needs to know about it before they waste their time responding to such obvious trollish and baiting posts.
87 posted on 08/26/2007 11:06:28 AM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
Do you think the posters who claim to see antisemitism in every pro-Ron Paul post are the same ones who post keywords like "holocaustdenierpaul," "ronpaulalqaedasman," and "stormfrontcandidate"?

Why are those keywords acceptable, anyway? Didn't the mods make a concerted effort not so long ago to warn or suspend people who posted malicious keyword spam, and to remove such spam?

88 posted on 08/26/2007 11:17:46 AM PDT by Turbopilot (iumop ap!sdn w,I 'aw dlaH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Allegra

The True Believers are out in mass...


89 posted on 08/26/2007 11:19:07 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

You need to find a different hobby. Your Paul-hating borders on clinical neurosis.


90 posted on 08/26/2007 11:21:43 AM PDT by NCSteve (I am not arguing with you - I am telling you. -- James Whistler)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
Carter subverts America out of righteous malice. Ron Paul does it out of opportunism and ego.

Exactly!

91 posted on 08/26/2007 11:31:46 AM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Tell J.J. I thank him for his comments. I don't agree with his views.

92 posted on 08/26/2007 11:33:06 AM PDT by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
Another good Ron Paul site.

www.outlawjournalism.com

93 posted on 08/26/2007 11:46:44 AM PDT by elhombrelibre (Democrats have plenty of patience for anti-American dictators but none for Iraqi democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Allegra
Textbook examples all...


94 posted on 08/26/2007 11:48:03 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: ejonesie22
Great book, by the way.

Related thread.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1886502/posts

95 posted on 08/26/2007 11:49:25 AM PDT by elhombrelibre (Democrats have plenty of patience for anti-American dictators but none for Iraqi democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

Been there, ignored that...


96 posted on 08/26/2007 11:50:08 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Turbopilot
Do you think the posters who claim to see antisemitism in every pro-Ron Paul post are the same ones who post keywords like "holocaustdenierpaul," "ronpaulalqaedasman," and "stormfrontcandidate"?

Gee, ya think? LOL.

The mods (at least Admin Mod and JimRob) can see who posted those. Generally, they don't go that much for policing keyword spam. There have been a few exceptions as in that thread where so many Juliebots opused. Admin Mod posted all the keywords and the identity of those who posted those keywords.

These Paul-haters employ the usual tactics of politically-correct liberals. This is a bogus line of attack as you'll notice that National Review and other sites and magazines have pointedly avoided making such remarks about Ron Paul. Why? Because they're so clearly false. No, only here on FR do you find this kind of liberal maliciousness, posted over and over. It's classic propaganda by FUD (fear, uncertainty & doubt).

The Paul-haters are a pack of clowns. Some of them are actual Klowns though they try to hide it. Their memberships at anti-FReeper forums is not difficult to discover via Google. So they can post their trash here and then run to their Juliebot-forum to crow about trashing Ron Paul or getting an RP supporter banned from FR in their secret WAker Klown forum where (they think) outsiders cannot see what they say.
97 posted on 08/26/2007 11:54:49 AM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa, wets himself over YouTube)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

The funny part is when the author mentions talking points and Limbaugh in the same breath. As if el Rushbo hasn’t been talking right from the Neo-Con script on a daily basis.


98 posted on 08/26/2007 11:57:52 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

Comment #99 Removed by Moderator

To: elhombrelibre
I have been referring to Paulette as True Believers myself for some time...

They are a perfect example of the phenomena...

100 posted on 08/26/2007 12:12:50 PM PDT by ejonesie22 (I don't use a sarcasm tag, it kills the effect...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson