Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Quarter-Degree Fix Fuels Climate Fight
The New York Times Company ^ | August 26, 2007 | ANDREW C. REVKIN

Posted on 08/25/2007 9:36:56 PM PDT by ricks_place

Never underestimate the power of the blogosphere and a quarter of a degree to inflame the fight over global warming.

A quarter-degree Fahrenheit is roughly the downward adjustment NASA scientists made earlier this month in their annual estimates of the average temperature in the contiguous 48 states since 2000. They corrected the numbers after an error in meshing two sets of temperature data was discovered by Stephen McIntyre, a blogger and retired business executive in Toronto. Smaller adjustments were made to some readings for some preceding years.

All of this would most likely have passed unremarkably if Mr. McIntyre had not blogged that the adjustments changed the rankings of warmest years for the contiguous states since 1895, when record-keeping began.

Suddenly, 1934 appeared to vault ahead of 1998 as the warmest year on record (by a statistically meaningless 0.036 degrees Fahrenheit). In NASA’s most recent data set, 1934 had followed 1998 by a statistically meaningless 0.018 degrees. Conservative bloggers, columnists and radio hosts pounced. “We have proof of man-made global warming,” Rush Limbaughtold his radio audience. “The man-made global warming is inside NASA.”

Mr. McIntyre, who has spent years seeking flaws in studies pointing to human-driven climate change, traded broadsides on the Web with James E. Hansen, the NASA team’s leader. Dr. Hansen said he would not “joust with court jesters” and Mr. McIntyre posited that Dr. Hansen might have a “Jor-El complex” — a reference to Superman’s father, who foresaw the destruction of his planet and sent his son packing.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: climatechange; dbm; environment; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; goebbelswarming; gorebullwarning; mediamob
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

1 posted on 08/25/2007 9:36:58 PM PDT by ricks_place
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ricks_place

The alarmist nonsense about global warming is statistically meaningless, to again repeat a phrase from the article.


2 posted on 08/25/2007 9:46:29 PM PDT by FoxInSocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place

Someone should ask the NYT, if the new numbers are statistically meaningless when compared to the old, that would mean that the reverse is true as well. So why the alarm when the old numbers were first reported?


3 posted on 08/25/2007 9:51:25 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Funny; those fractions of a degree were the basis of global warming. Now that they’ve been corrected they’re “insignificant”.


4 posted on 08/25/2007 9:51:39 PM PDT by webboy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place
One quarter of one degree. When it was an increase, thats all it took for the Gorebal Warming crowd to start the ‘We’re-all-gonna-die!’ crap. Now, when its one quarter degree cooler its ‘statistically insignificant’.

I got yer cardon credits for ya, right here...

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

5 posted on 08/25/2007 9:54:47 PM PDT by IYellAtMyTV (Workday Forecast--Increasing pressure towards afternoon. Rum likely by evening.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webboy45

Interesting, isn’t it. Reminds me of how everytime we have apparent abnormal cold temperatures it is blamed on global warming. There really is nothing that can’t be attributed to global warming. Kind of neat.


6 posted on 08/25/2007 9:55:33 PM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place

A central tenet of the scientific method is reproducibility. NASA and others who monitor the Earth’s temperature refuse to open their software code for inspection. This should be a red-flag in any peer-review situation. Now that an error has been found in the methodology, complete disclosure is more important than ever.


7 posted on 08/25/2007 10:00:24 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast ([Thompson 2008!])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place

Hypocrisy, thy name is Al Gore.


8 posted on 08/25/2007 10:01:15 PM PDT by cookcounty ("I have not yet begun to fight!! ...and I'm utterly exhausted!" --Harry "the Loser" Reid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place
“Mr. McIntyre, who has spent years seeking flaws in studies pointing to human-driven climate change. . .”

What Steve McIntyre actually does is methodically check the quality of historic climate measurements and statistics that outfits like NASA, NOAA and IPCC use to come to conclusions on climate change. Hansen admitted publicly that McIntyre was right.

McIntyre regularly exposes flawed and “adjusted” data used by leading authorities to dramatize their arguments:

http://www.climateaudit.org/

9 posted on 08/25/2007 10:01:20 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place

10 posted on 08/25/2007 10:07:19 PM PDT by caveat emptor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ItisaReligionofPeace

“Honey, not tonight, I have a global warming”


11 posted on 08/25/2007 10:47:14 PM PDT by wildcatf4f3 (Hey, this aint like the 1960s, this is like the 1860s.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place; xcamel

fyi


12 posted on 08/25/2007 11:40:07 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Granddaughters!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Exactly - so many jackals in the MSM made such a fuss over statistically insignificant differences when they thought it boosted the GW crusade. As for that charlatan James Hansen, now he hides behind whining about “court jesters” but Albore is one of the worst such clowns of all time and we don’t see James Hansen out there correcting Albore’s lies and exaggerations. No, Hansen is just another shill for the left and should have been fired long ago — real scientists could never behave as he does.


13 posted on 08/26/2007 12:51:39 AM PDT by Enchante (Reid and Pelosi Defeatocrats: Surrender Now - Peace for Our Time!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

The Mainstream Media just love their Lying Global Warming Poster Child, James 'Handsome'

Hansen believes, as did Albert Einstein, that speaking out politically at key moments is part of a scientist's responsibility. He also rejects the idea that scientists should pose as completely objective fact machines that refrain from offering opinions that aren't purely scientific in nature (even about subjects that they know better anyone else). What's refreshing is that he makes no apologies for that. "There's a big gap between what is understood by the scientists at the forefront of the research, and what is known by the people who need to know," he says.

14 posted on 08/26/2007 4:40:52 AM PDT by Stallone (Free Republic - The largest collection of volunteer Freedom Fighters the world has ever known)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Stallone
Global Warming's Parade of Liars:


15 posted on 08/26/2007 5:04:04 AM PDT by Stallone (Free Republic - The largest collection of volunteer Freedom Fighters the world has ever known)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; gruffwolf; ...

FReepmail me to get on or off


Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown

New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH

Ping me if you find one I've missed.



16 posted on 08/26/2007 5:25:30 AM PDT by xcamel (FDT/2008 -- talk about it >> irc://irc.freenode.net/fredthompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Someone should ask the NYT, if the new numbers are statistically meaningless when compared to the old, that would mean that the reverse is true as well. So why the alarm when the old numbers were first reported?

Exactly. Did you send the letter to the editor asking this question? Someone should.

17 posted on 08/26/2007 5:38:56 AM PDT by RobFromGa (FDT/TBD in 2008!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wildcatf4f3

Exactly. LOL!


18 posted on 08/26/2007 6:06:29 AM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ricks_place
In NASA’s most recent data set, 1934 had followed 1998 by a statistically meaningless 0.018 degrees.

Well, then doesn't it follow that their trumpeting of the original data was just as meaningless??? Rush was just illustrating absurdity.

19 posted on 08/26/2007 6:11:41 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Brian J. Marotta, 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub, (1948-2007) Rest In Peace, our FRiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks
This is why you will never see a statistical test of the climate change data. It is all well within the margin of error. Even political pollsters are more ethical than the "climate change" enthusiasts. At least they report their error factor.

So much for "science" in Lysenko-ized America.

20 posted on 08/26/2007 6:21:58 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson