[onedoug]

I honestly hope your right. I want the best guy up front to take on islamodemocommunism.

Mitt does strike me at first glance as being the consumate politician: the hair, the oil, the ease with which he seems to slide from one side to another.

But the more I see and here him, the more real he seems. I like that he's been married to one woman longer than my wife and I have; that his family life seems genuine; that what you see is really what you get and more, witness a recent radio program in which some slippery d-jock tried haranguing him about his religion, but that he steered consistently toward a multi-faith outlook, then when deliberately kept open-miked but unawares during the breaks his real religious pluralism yet loyalty to his faith showed in droves. (It was a played by Hugh Hewitt.)

Yeah, I think I really like this guy. I'm with Mitt unless and until I can be swayed.

And I think he can clean Hillary's communist clock.

[counterpunch]

And I think he can clean Hillary's communist clock.

The only candidate with higher negatives than Hillary is Mitt.
Being that he's not nearly as well known, the "Anyone But Romney" vote might not be as cemented as the "Anyone But Clinton" vote, but since much of the opposition to him stems from religious bigotry, I don't think he can bring those numbers down as much as he would need to.