To: microgood
"The lawsuit said Prieto does not like banks and customarily carries his savings as cash." Nonsense.
I think it's probable cause to confiscate it, but there should be a very low bar of "proof" and expedited procedure to get it back.
16 posted on
08/25/2007 12:53:44 PM PDT by
elfman2
(An army of amateurs doing the media's job.)
To: elfman2
I think it's probable cause to confiscate it, but there should be a very low bar of "proof" and expedited procedure to get it back.
So possessing cash is a crime?
To: elfman2
I think it's probable cause to confiscate it, but there should be a very low bar of "proof" and expedited procedure to get it back.In the land of the free and home of the brave you see mere possession of cash as probable cause for confiscation?
Un-freepin-believable.
22 posted on
08/25/2007 1:01:47 PM PDT by
Eagle Eye
(If you agee with Democrats you agree with America's enemies.)
To: elfman2
You are really a scarry person and I can’t believe you consider yourself a FReeper. Isn’t it a fairly fundamental principle that the government has to prove a crime beyond a reasonable doubt? Freeper you are not. Nanny state loser, you are.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson