This sounds suspiciously familiar.
My sister who taught special ed ended up teaching the GRANDCHILDREN of her original students....and there were LOTS of them because the retarded have a difficult time with birth control. Low IQ is strongly influenced by heredity. At the rate we are going society will be overwhelmed by the “marching morons” within two generations. While forcible sterilization, institutionalization, and drugging are horrible, our society needs to discourage low IQ people from procreating faster than the rest of the population which they are currently doing.
Without the retarded, your sister would be unemployable.
I am touched by the compassion of your family.
I’ve always wondered about this. While there is obviously a strong environmental component to intelligence, it is equally obvious that there is a hereditary component that is at least as strong.
Isn’t artificial assistance to those who are incapable of succeeding in society a rather anti-evolutionary approach? Given the relative reproduction rates of successful and less successful people, aren’t we breeding for low intelligence? Survival of the least fit?
Given enough generations, what could the consequences of this approach be?
This sounds suspiciously familiar.
So your sister owes her success and livlihood to “marching morons” and yet you want them warehoused and sterilized. Without them, where would your sister be? Honestly, I’m sitting here laughing at the hypocrisy and ignorance.
Then let’s discourage the rich and well educated to only have 2 children as well. Their selfishness is nothing to be desired.