Even the Koran itself says it is written so all can understand it. They Koran wasn't even written, it was orally communicated at first, in the local languages. All of what is known about Mohammad and his ways was recorded and written by Ishaq, There is no other earlier or more accurate source, all others draw from what Ishaq originally wrote, and Tabari retained the most of all Ishaqs wrote.
If these Islamic scholars have it wrong, then nothing else can be right, Mohammad can't exist nor can the Koran and Islam, which would be a GOOD thing for the entire world.
Islam is what it is, a book of evil and hatred, calling for the death of anyone who resists Islam.
Nobody can deny the entire history of Islam since it was invented by Mohammad until today has been nothing but a continuous war of terrorism, mass slaughter, torture, and misery where ever it goes.
Ultimately, Islam is what it's followers show us it is. That makes it impossible for these Islamic apologists to tell us that Islam is a religion of peace, that it is being hijacked by a few rogue fundamentalists, when in it's entire history, it has left nothing but a trail of blood.
“Christopher Dunn, of the New York Civil Liberties Union, said the report risks turning law-abiding Muslims away from cooperating with the authorities: “While aggressive counterterrorism policies are to be commended, this report appears to treat all young Muslims as suspects and to lay the groundwork for wholesale surveillance of Muslim communities without there being any sign of unlawful conduct.”
Perhaps Mr. Dunn should read and “interpret the Koran” with the same eye as he “interprets” this report.
Mr. Dunn says:
“this report appears to treat all young Muslims as suspects”
and the Koran “appears” to treat all non-muslims as ???????
Mr. Dunn says: ???