To: Petronski; JCEccles
Just fyi, it seems the latest Romney lying points--er--talking points are that Fred is somehow guilty of "serial adultery and multiple divorces." Far be it from me to enter your and JC's dueling spin chambers, but an honest reading of the post in question will show that to be a cut on Newt, as a purported "advisor", not Fred.
Now, pardon the interruption, and carry on with your mutual half-truth fests.
120 posted on
08/25/2007 12:31:28 PM PDT by
LexBaird
(Tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
To: LexBaird; Jim Robinson
...serial adultery and multiple divorces are virtues in a candidate. FRed and Newt qualify on that score. You must be illiterate. He said Fred and Newt qualify on the "virtues" of "serial adultery" and "multiple divorces."
It would appear from the record that Newt does qualify.
Fred does not. Eccles lied.
121 posted on
08/25/2007 12:34:18 PM PDT by
Petronski
(Why would Romney lie about Ronald Reagan's record?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson