[RobbyS]

...drew on a shaky grasp of history No, merely one at variance by the liberal line. That history invariably begins with a false version of Tet and goes downhill from there. Never mind that Creighton Abrams managed to set the Communists insurgency back on its heels and stabilize the South while, at the same time withdrawing most of our forces from the country. The problem is that after the Paris peace Accords, we stopped all aid to South Viet Nam. The John Kerry's in the Democratic Party had decided that the country would be better off under Communist rule.

[okie01]

The problem is that after the Paris peace Accords, we stopped all aid to South Viet Nam. The John Kerry's in the Democratic Party had decided that the country would be better off under Communist rule.

Some history, liberals prefer to revise.

Other history, they prefer to ignore.

The above falls in the latter group.

[tomnbeverly]

Maybe old Jim here doesn’t realize there is a significant difference of people living under communist rule and terrorist rule... or has he forgotten like so many others that 9/11 was a misison carried out by these murderers or that they have cut off heads, burned bodies, and God knows what other kinds of torture to American servicemen...

Jim here is in a state of denial these type must have victory shoved down their throat... “For the Good of the Country”