Skip to comments.
Why America’s Pullout From Vietnam Worked (Barf Alert)
Newsweek/MSNBC ^
| Aug 23, 2007
| Michael Hirsh
Posted on 08/24/2007 1:24:55 AM PDT by DakotaRed
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: gridlock
You can't get this stupid without drinking... a lot... Oh I dont know?
If you saw a couple of Michael Moore movies, maybe.
21
posted on
08/24/2007 7:03:10 AM PDT
by
Pontiac
(Patriotism is the natural consequence of having a free mind in a free society.)
To: Pontiac
If you saw a couple of Michael Moore movies, maybe. But I can't sit through a Michael Moore movie without drinking... a lot!
22
posted on
08/24/2007 9:29:55 AM PDT
by
gridlock
(You’ll never grow old with Hillary-Care!)
To: DakotaRed
In the waning days of that epochal year, 1991, the propaganda against American involvement in Southeast Asia was suddenly no longer politically correct. That works just fine - if America's Pullout the Democratic Party's bugout from Vietnam occurred in 1990. But here's a news flash for Michael Hirsh: the Democratic Party's bugout from Vietnam occurred during the Ford Administration - that is, over 15 years earlier. And many others have graphically illustrated what happened to the last people who trusted the government of the US and the Democratic Party when the US reneged on a comittment.
23
posted on
08/24/2007 1:48:19 PM PDT
by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
To: DakotaRed
Because a whole bunch of little yellow people that the left doesn’t like were brutally slaughtered?
To: <1/1,000,000th%
Leftists never make a cause-effect connection between their actions (or inactions) and the actual results.
All that matters is how they FEEEEEEL about an issue, and their intentions.
25
posted on
08/24/2007 1:55:17 PM PDT
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: DakotaRed
26
posted on
08/24/2007 1:59:49 PM PDT
by
savedbygrace
(SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
To: DakotaRed
This was the harsh aftermath that George W. Bush attempted to describe this week when he warned against pulling out of Iraq as we did in Vietnam.
No it wasn't. President Bush was referring to events in the 1970s, not the 1990s. It's like the left has a mental disorder that works around the immediate postwar history of Vietnam.
The decision to pull out had very little effect on the ultimate outcome.
Yeah, so over a generation after the Vietnam war, things begin to start looking positive for Vietnam, so things were never bad there after 1975 (/s). And of course, he has a magical historical what-if box that tells him if the Vietnam War never happened, it would not have affected Russia's relationship with China, the fall of the Berlin wall, or the end of the USSR.
27
posted on
08/24/2007 2:02:15 PM PDT
by
dan1123
(You are to be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect. --Jesus)
To: Thrownatbirth
It's amazing how much misinformation Hirsh crams into a single sentence.
It only makes sense if you live in leftist delusional fairyland. It's actually a good debate technique. The unaware public gets presented a fairyland instead of the real world where leftist ideas always seem to fail and the facts never seem to go their way.
28
posted on
08/24/2007 2:06:43 PM PDT
by
dan1123
(You are to be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect. --Jesus)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson