Posted on 08/23/2007 9:51:13 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
AMSTERDAM, Netherlands - The treaty that will eventually replace the Kyoto Protocol on climate change could be a potpourri of legal obligations, nonbinding commitments and aid arrangements for the developing world, but each nation should choose its own course, the U.N.'s top climate official said Thursday.
At the outset of a season of climate negotiations, Yvo de Boer, executive secretary of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change, said countries such as the United States are mistaken if they dismiss the Kyoto process on the grounds it is forcing them into unwanted legal commitments.
"Countries themselves are in the best position to decide how they can achieve a target to which they commit," he told The Associated Press from his headquarters in Bonn, Germany. "You should not seek to impose legally binding commitments on countries."
At the same time, he said, it was up to the industrialized nations to take the lead in fighting global warming, and that binding commitments give a strong signal to energy investors on where to put their money.
De Boer's comments appeared aimed at minimizing differences with the United States, which opted out of binding international agreements, but which is now trying to seize the initiative in shaping the next phase of world climate policy.
The U.S. position has angered the European Union, which has adopted increasingly higher targets and imposed tough regulations on its member nations beyond their Kyoto commitments.
President Bush has called a conference in Washington next month of the world's 15 biggest polluters, including India, China and several other countries not bound by the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012. De Boer will head the U.N. delegation.
That meeting will take place three days after a broader meeting on climate change summoned by U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon on Sept. 24 in New York. Both the Washington and New York talks are geared toward a major U.N. meeting in Bali, Indonesia, in December to discuss a successor agreement to Kyoto.
The Kyoto agreement requires 35 industrial nations to cut their global-warming emissions 5 percent below 1990 levels by 2012. It also devised a carbon trading market and set up a system for nations to offset part of their obligations by sponsoring emission-reduction projects in developing countries. De Boer said 700 such projects — such as financing hydroelectric or wind power projects — are in the pipeline.
De Boer said an important element in the post-Kyoto climate regime will be how countries can gain credit by helping the developing world.
"It makes sense to get the biggest bang for your bucks, to identify the most cost-effective emissions reduction options around the world. The atmosphere doesn't care where you reduce emissions as long as you reduce emissions," he said.
These people are truly organized idiots. Go after the traditional poisonus pollutants which first world countries have controlled somewhat such as airborn and water pollution (hello China). Make provision to adapt to global warming or cooling which will occur no matter what anybody does or says.
Lawrence Solomon's "The Deniers" (a series of articles on the view of scientists who have been labelled "Global Warming Deniers"):
Other References:
>”It makes sense to get the biggest bang for your bucks, to identify the most cost-effective emissions reduction options around the world.
Our bucks stop here, De Boer. IOW, shove it.
Rather, “De Boer said an important element in the post-Kyoto climate regime will be how (rich) countries can gain credit by (getting taxed by the UN) to (transfer some of that tax money to) the developing world (and the rest to corrupt third-world dictators and bureaucrats).”
This whole human caused global warming scare is about UN power, UN taxation, socialism, redistribution of wealth from prosperous countries to third world holes, and bringing down the USA.
Rubbish and window dressing. Not one EU country is anywhere near meeting its "Kyoto commitments", nor will it ever.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.