Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rightinthemiddle

There are a couple of reasons McCaskill won. The stem cell amendment pulled out some extra lib voters, including, as you astutely point out, single women. But Southwest MO and rural MO did not go as strongly for Talent as a statewide (R) needs to overcome the urban centers.

Talent is a decent, true conservative guy, but a bumbling, inept candidate. He did not distinguish himself in debates, often looking childish. After his loss to Pee-Wee Holden in 2000, he should not have been pushed for the Senate.

McCaskill won by default — a warning to the Republicans nationwide.


31 posted on 08/23/2007 8:51:21 AM PDT by old3030 (I may have lost my lunchbox, but I'm still here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: old3030

McCaskill took about 5% more of the vote in southwest Missouri, which was the difference. A lot of those were first time women voters and swing voters on stem cell research.


35 posted on 08/23/2007 9:20:37 AM PDT by rightinthemiddle (Without the Media, the Left and Islamofacists are Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson