To: aMorePerfectUnion
Another leftwing Globe article.
The more they hate him, the more that any conservative shouldn’t.
To: SteveMcKing
Ok ok Globe describes Mitt’s government subsidized health care and because the Globe does not like Mitt...conservatives should? huh?
8 posted on
08/22/2007 12:56:07 PM PDT by
svcw
(There is no plan B.)
To: SteveMcKing
The Mitt-worshipers can't stand the heat.
There can be no criticism of their annointed one.
They even refuse to read anything that might be critical of him.
They simply ignore the facts and attack the messenger.
10 posted on
08/22/2007 1:01:03 PM PDT by
JohnnyZ
(Romney : "not really trying to define what is technically amnesty. I'll let the lawyers decide.")
To: SteveMcKing
Is anything they printed not true, or is attacking people who tell th e truth about romney the only way to defend him?
12 posted on
08/22/2007 1:02:25 PM PDT by
flashbunny
(<--- Free Anti-Rino graphics! See Rudy the Rino get exposed as a liberal with his own words!)
To: SteveMcKing
Never, ever believe anything you read in the Boston Globe; it’s owned by the NYTs, and EVERYTHING they print is to enhance the liberal DNC agenda.
The TIMES and GLOBE are nothing but mouthpieces for the far left.
13 posted on
08/22/2007 1:08:37 PM PDT by
kjo
To: SteveMcKing
Another leftwing Globe article.
Then read the Wall Street Journal Article. Trying to force someone who cannot afford health insurance to pay $350 a month for it is not exactly a workable solution. But since the penalty is that the person loses a tax deduction, is just raising taxes on those that are already struggling.
Bad Medicine
To: SteveMcKing; Spiff; TChris
"Yesterday, he began airing a radio advertisement that suggests he cracked down on illegal immigrants by getting the authority to have State Police arrest them -- without noting that the policy was rescinded by his successor, Governor Deval Patrick, before it ever took effect."
All true facts.
Poor baby Mitt-worshipers can't take the heat!
Incidentally, Mitt waited until the last month of his 4-year term before getting that policy in place -- a policy that never even took effect.
21 posted on
08/22/2007 1:21:22 PM PDT by
JohnnyZ
(Romney : "not really trying to define what is technically amnesty. I'll let the lawyers decide.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson