Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PICTURES: RAF Typhoon intercepts Russian Tupolev Tu-95 bomber
www.flightglobal.com ^ | 22/08/07 | Craig Hoyle

Posted on 08/22/2007 10:50:33 AM PDT by Freeport

In a scene reminiscent of the Cold War, a Russian air force Tupolev Tu-95 bomber is pictured being intercepted by a Royal Air Force fighter before approaching too close to UK airspace on 17 August.

But for the first time, the aircraft providing so-called quick reaction alert (QRA) cover is a Eurofighter Typhoon F2 from the RAF's 11 Sqn - the unit tasked with leading the type's evolution into a multirole fighter also capable of performing ground-attack duties in Afghanistan from July 2008.

Russian bombers have been intercepted by UK fighters on several occasions so far this year, with their presence reflecting President Vladimir Putin's eagerness to underline Moscow's military capabilities as it stakes claim to Polar mineral resources and approaches national elections to take place early next year.

Previous meetings have been between Tu-95s and RAF Panavia Tornado F3 interceptors, with the latter gradually handing over QRA responsibility for the southern UK to Typhoons from RAF Coningsby in Lincolnshire. The latest encounter took place over the North Atlantic, according to the RAF.


(Excerpt) Read more at flightglobal.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Russia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: aviation; coldwar2; nothingnewhere; raf; russian; tu95
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: rednesss

Read this for what really happened to KAL 007.

http://www.amazon.com/Incident-Sakhalin-True-Mission-Flight/dp/1568580541/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/002-8700002-1348024?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1187810978&sr=8-1


41 posted on 08/22/2007 12:31:41 PM PDT by He'sComingBack!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Dang. Everyone gets to post this article.

Apparently duplicates are the in thing on FR nowadays.

42 posted on 08/22/2007 12:36:20 PM PDT by TChris (Has anyone under Mitt Romney's leadership ever been worse off because he is Mormon?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Freeport
Russian bombers have been intercepted by UK fighters on several occasions so far this year, with their presence reflecting President Vladimir Putin's eagerness to underline Moscow's military capabilities as it ...

Military capabilities?
A turboprop with a raar crosssection like the Astrodome?
A 1950s 400mph bomber?

Oh K.

43 posted on 08/22/2007 1:14:00 PM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: He'sComingBack!
I don't have enough tinfoil to embark upon the reading of that book. I'll tuck that one away with the "we didn't land on the moon" conspiracy theorists books.


44 posted on 08/22/2007 1:29:52 PM PDT by rednesss (Fred Thompson - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: rednesss
The Soviet Union stated it did not know the aircraft was civilian and suggested it had entered Soviet airspace as a deliberate provocation by the United States, the purpose being to test its military response capabilities, repeating the provocation of Korean Air Flight 902, also shot down by Soviet aircraft over the Kola Peninsula in 1978.

Russians know they're doing a cold war dance - kinda creepy.

45 posted on 08/22/2007 8:23:46 PM PDT by GOPJ (It's not the spelling ---- groupthink's killing newspapers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY

Not daily. They used to during the Cold War. The flights were very infrequent after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The Bears and Blackjacks have made very infrequent flights into the UK air identification zone since the collapse of the Soviet Union.


46 posted on 08/24/2007 11:43:54 AM PDT by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Turbo-prob. All new-build from the 80s and early 90s. They are long-range air-launched cruise missile carriers. Think B-52Hs doing ALCM stand-off.


47 posted on 08/24/2007 11:45:13 AM PDT by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 9422WMR

Not slow. Those are turbo-props. The top speeds are not far-off the B-52. The aircraft is a stand-off ALCM launh platform. The range of the Tu-95MS is incredible due to those turbo-props enginese. The armament allows the Tu-95MS to stand-off thousands of kms from the target.


48 posted on 08/24/2007 11:50:39 AM PDT by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Freeport

I was expecting a Hawker Typhoon circa WW2.


49 posted on 08/24/2007 11:53:35 AM PDT by Sensei Ern (http://www.myspace.com/reconcomedy - Ann Coulter is My Press Secretary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

WWII fighters wouldn’t be able to keep-up. The Tu-95MS is powered by turbo-props. Very fast!


50 posted on 08/24/2007 11:55:16 AM PDT by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

It isn’t designed to penetrate hostile airspace. It is an ALCM carrier. Very fast and nearly as fast as the B-52. Think B-52 in ALCM stand-off mode. The Russian ALCMa are longer-ranged than anything in the US ALCM inventory.


51 posted on 08/24/2007 11:58:08 AM PDT by Tommyjo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Tommyjo

I wish we could send something REALLY insulting to intercept them.


52 posted on 08/24/2007 6:39:24 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Tommyjo
Those bad boys can carry up to 16 Kh-55 Granat, also known as the AS-15 Kent air-launched cruise missile, which carries either a 200-kiloton nuclear warhead or a 1,000-pound high explosive warhead.

These missiles have a range of up to 2,000 miles, which means that you can launch from over Los Angeles and hit targets in Atlanta, Cincinnati, and Detroit! They can use these long ranges when firing at stationary targets, like cities, which means that they would be on the outer edge of engagement by every fighter in our arsenal. We would have to have AWACS patroling out a long ways in order to pick them up in time to vector fighters onto them before they enter missile range.

What's really good news (just a hint of sarcasm) is the fact that a company in Ukraine sold some of these missiles to China and Iran a few years back. The Iranians would have to use the old P-3 patrol planes we sold them back in the 1970's in order to launch these missiles, but China has Tu-16 Badger bombers and is in negotiations for Tu-22 Backfires, Tu-95 Bears, and Tu-160 Blackjacks, all of which can carry these missiles.

53 posted on 08/24/2007 7:16:57 PM PDT by Stonewall Jackson (The Hunt for FRed November. 11/04/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Ah ah, not with some advance stand-off missiles.


54 posted on 10/13/2007 3:24:57 AM PDT by Mike Powell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Stonewall Jackson

You got it, pal. With those missiles plus TU-95’s good old range, even with their 50 years old technology those ‘Bear’ can still delivery huge blow upon her enemy.

China too has upgrade and modified their TU-16 or H-6 bombers to become a stand-off missiles platform.


55 posted on 10/13/2007 3:31:37 AM PDT by Mike Powell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson