Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sonora
Cutting the FF rate would, in effect, support the high cost of housing which is inflationary. Cutting the rate would be a stupid, political move and I’m hoping that the Fed doesn’t go there.M

A voice of sanity. Funny, everyone is convinced that the Fed will cut rates but I haven't heard anything from the Fed itself except that inflation is still a concern.

And, contrary to what is being claimed by some people here, inflation is very bad for owners of financial assets. The fact that the Fed is willing to fight it is good for stocks and bonds - in the long run.

11 posted on 08/22/2007 2:32:49 PM PDT by groanup (Limited government is the answer. What's the question?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: groanup

The FED increase the FF rate on 05/10/06 to 5.25% with Risk Assessment of “Inflation Risk” versus a Risk Assessment of “Balanced” when they increased it to 5.00% on 05/10/06. Since that time, no change but each time the Risk Assessment is noted as “Inflation Risk” (8 meetings).

So, why would the FED decrease the FF rate now? Inflation has not disappears - the housing market is inflated, big time - food costs are increasing along with tons of other items. No, the FED must not move the FF rate up or down at this time. If it does, it’s politics and the FED does not play politics, I hope.


13 posted on 08/22/2007 3:53:31 PM PDT by Sonora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson